Categories
Book Review

Money of the Mind – Book Review

I’m off on holiday for the next week so there will be no posts until Monday, July 23.

On with the review…

This rather long book by James Grant is another in Bernstein’s recommended reading list which I am determined to work through.

Basically this book is about the history of American banking from around 1850 to the mid-1980s. I found the first half quite fascinating as it detailed the “wild west” of banking in the 1800’s with numerous bank runs, bank failures, bank startups and lots of colourful characters. The book explains that before the US government had a federal currency, each bank would print its own currency (backed by gold) and people would trade the currencies at some relation to par value based on how solvent they thought the bank was or how far away the bank was. The other thing I learned was that personal bank loans were not made popular until the 1920’s. Before that banks only lent to people and businesses “who didn’t really need the money”. Real estate loans were another item that proper banks didn’t stoop to. Perhaps way back when, real estate values were not as well defined as they are today?

The second half of the book I found quite boring as it kept moving further along in history into the 1980s but using the same ideas that banks would go overboard with lending in the good times and then get too conservative after a crash. Without the historical aspect I just wasn’t interested. I recommend reading this book but if you get to a point where it starts to get boring then just put it down – you’ve gotten all you’re going to get out of it at that point.

Categories
Personal Finance

How to Predict the Future Part 2

As discussed yesterday, we laid out a retirement calculation for Bob, and concluded that he won’t have enough money to reach his desired gross income of $45k in today’s dollars.

What to do? Well either Bob can cut out a few lattes and spa treatments in retirement or he increases his annual contributions or he works a few more years or some combination of all three. The spreadsheet linked below, shows in the first tab named “increase contributions” that he would have to increase his contributions in today’s dollars from $10k to about $19k in order to meet his requirement of $45k in retirement. This amount of contribution probably isn’t realistic given that it’s a huge increase and if he has to double his contribution then he probably has to cut back a lot on his pre-retirement life which might affect his desired spending in retirement. For example if he can live on less money while working then he can live on less money on retirement.

The next two alternatives cover the options if he wants to work later or wants to reduce retirement income.

The second spreadsheet tab named “work longer” – Bob decides that that he can’t live without the lattes and spas either before or after retirement so the only other option is to work longer than age 60. In this case he need $1.1 million in today’s dollars to meet his requirements and has to work until the end of the year in which he turns 65 to fulfill this scenario.

In the last example named “compromise” – Bob says that he can cut some expenses so he will only require $40k in retirement, he will contribute $14k per year but still wants to retire by age 60 – in this case he will have a gross income of $40,690 upon retirement.

So to sum up, Bob can keep his $45k gross income requirement in retirement but he has to work an extra five years to age 65 or increase his contribution from $10k to $19k. Another solution is to work to age 60, increase his contribution to $14k and live on just over $40k in retirement.

Some future posts will deal with more realistic retirement scenarios. If there are two parties involved, Canada Pension Plan, OAS, pension income, and taxes then the scenario becomes a bit more complicated but it’s still relatively easy to calculate.

How to Predict the Future Part I

Retirement SpreadSheet

Categories
Personal Finance

How to Predict the Future Part 1

That’s right – predict the future! Ok, this method won’t help with lottery tickets, horse racing, stock prices or anything else that will make you rich quick, however it does apply to retirement planning, particularly with predicting the future values of your retirement income and retirement expenses which of course is all you need to calculate to predict your retirement. Planning your retirement is not as simple as tying your shoes but it’s not so complicated that you have to pay an advisor thousands of dollars to figure it out for you.

Everyone has heard all the scary stories about how you will need one million dollars to retire, or two million…or whatever. These numbers sound unreachable for someone who might only have a retirement portfolio of $100k (or no retirement portfolio for that matter) but it’s important to remember that these are future dollars. One million dollars in twenty years is the equivalent to $560,613 dollars right now assuming 3% inflation. This is admittedly still a large number but it’s a lot less than a million dollars.

In the past, to calculate my retirement scenario, I had assembled a complex retirement spreadsheet that involved using the future value of all contributions, withdrawals, taxes, income etc. This worked reasonably well except that it was complicated and didn’t lend itself to change very easily. One of the things I learned from Four Pillars of Investing was to calculate retirement scenarios using today’s dollars to greatly simplify things. The way this is accomplished is to subtract your estimated inflation rate from your estimated portfolio return to get a “real return” and to use today’s dollars for everything else such as portfolio contributions and anticipated withdrawals.

I’ve created a relatively simple retirement scenario in the spreadsheet below, which is for someone (Bob) who is turning 40 this year, has a $250k portfolio and contributes $10k per year. He desires $45k of gross income in retirement at age 60. His expected investment return is 7% but I will subtract 3% inflation to get a real return of 4%. We will also assume that he will get no other income other than from this portfolio and that contributions are made at the end of the year. He will retire at the end of the year in which he turns 60. The goal of this exercise is to determine if he is contributing enough to meet his goal of $45k (in today’s dollars) gross income in retirement. We will also use the “4% rule” which basically states that the initial annual withdrawal from a retirement portfolio should be 4% of the portfolio. This will be discussed in many future posts as it is a particular favourite subject of mine!

If you check out the spreadsheet you will note some interesting things. By age 60 his $250k portfolio has grown to $889k in today’s dollars. Twenty years from now that portfolio will actually be $1,654,516 in year 2027 dollars. This sounds like an incredible amount but it isn’t enough to meet the Bob’s requirement of $45k gross income in today’s dollars. I calculate the portfolio each year by multiplying the previous year value by 1.04 and adding the contribution to that.

As you can see at the bottom of the sheet, 4% of $845k is only $35,575 which falls far short of Bob’s expected gross income.

Tomorrow we will look at a couple of solutions for Bob so he can achieve his goals.

How to Predict the Future Part II

Retirement I

Categories
Personal Finance

Save Costs on Traffic Tickets

Ever get a traffic ticket and just paid the full fine and accepted the points? If you wanted to try fighting or reducing the ticket, there’s always been the option of booking a court case and showing up and either pleading down the ticket with the assistant DA or actually going to trial and hope the cop doesn’t show up. Both of these methods can be successful but they can take up a lot of time and be somewhat stressful – especially if you’ve never been on trial before.

Well my wife got a ticket last year and decided to take advantage of the City of Toronto Court Services process in which you can “plead guilty with an explanation” and basically plead down the ticket with the assistant DA. Actually the cop who gave her the ticket told her to go and plead it down.

According to the website it sounds like a quick easy process, but in practice she showed up and got a number (you have to line up to get the number first). The room was hot and crowded. After about a one hour wait she talked to the customer service rep. Then she went into another room (through security) and waited longer to talk to the assistant DA. Once that talk was over she waited some more and then got a sheet from the assistant DA with the new deal – then she went back to the first room and got another number and waited to pay – this was a different line so it didn’t take long.

Bottom line is that she was there about 2.5 hours, got the ticket reduced from $110 to $80 but she paid $20 for parking so net savings (not counting gas & lunch) was $10. The two points were removed which apparently is the main thing. I’m not sure if two demerit points has any effect on your insurance but I guess if you keep getting them then your insurance will go up.

Tip #1- If you are doing this and are going to the downtown Toronto court then go before nine in order to get the early bird parking which is only $10. It gets crowded later in the day as well so earlier is better

Tip #2 – Don’t bring your young child with you (if you have one).

Tip #3 – Since you have to go through security, don’t bring any knives or Swiss army knife key chains.

Categories
Personal Finance

Personal Inflation Rate vs. CPI

One of the efforts I had thought about doing for retirement planning was to measure my personal inflation rate in order to have a more accurate value to use than the CPI value. Realistically it’s not going to work – there are too many variables and potential changes in lifestyle. For example over time, our interests may change from cheap hobbies to expensive hobbies, our young son will probably eat more as he gets bigger and will require more money for activities. It will be difficult to separate the basic “retirement spending” from normal spending. The other problem is that there is a fine line between personal inflation rate and plain old overspending. At some point if you are going to retire you have to be able to live within your means even if that entails reducing or eliminating expenditures on activities that you enjoy.

Fabrice Taylor writes in the Globe & Mail about the fact that the CPI doesn’t necessarily match up to the inflation rate that you or I might experience within our lives. This figure is very important for retirement planning since the real rate of return of your investment portfolio is the actual return minus the inflation rate. Taylor refers to a study done in the US which says that the real inflation rate is twice as much as the official rate.

Another good example is financial planning for education costs. I’ve read that post-secondary tuition has gone up about 5% per year over the last decade. If you are doing projections for your education fund then using the CPI will understate the actual inflation since tuition is a big part of the school costs.

Since I’m still a few years away from retirement I don’t worry too much about my assumptions for rate of return and inflation. Personally I use 3% inflation in my calculations which is probably a good enough estimate for my purposes.

Categories
Investing

BCE and Capital Gains

I’ve been reading quite a bit recently about how owners of BCE (outside their rrsp) will be getting nailed with capital gains taxes once the takeover is complete. Jonathan Chevreau wrote a post about this in his blog, the Wealthy Boomer. In his comments, I noted that given the recent increase in price of the stock due to the impending takeover, the capital gains shouldn’t be a factor since the $12 price increase will cover any capital gains tax bill. This is true, assuming of course that the stock would have stayed in the $30 range for the next little while.

My worst case capital gains estimate is as follows:

If an investor has one share with an ACB of zero (worst case scenario) they will receive $42.75 for that share. Because of the capital gains tax they have to declare $21.37 as income. Let’s assume 50% income tax to keep it simple. They would then pay $10.68 in tax which means they would net $32.07 for a share that was only trading at about $30 up until a few months ago. I would argue that the final outcome of this transaction is a tax-free switch from BCE to say BMO (Bank of Montreal) with a $2 bonus tossed in (to pay the accountant?).

Chevreau made a great point about how there should be different rules for involuntary taxable events (sells) which prompted me to propose the following:

The government should change the taxable event rules to exclude involuntary switches from one Canadian company to another. Ie if you own a Canadian public company like BCE and it gets taken over and you buy another Canadian company with the proceeds then there should be no taxable event incurred and the adjusted cost base from your original shares will be transferred to the new Canadian company shares.

Any thoughts? Is this a reasonable policy for the government or is a forced sale and resulting capital gains a normal and foreseeable risk of owning equities?

Categories
Opinion

Pennies

First off, a big thanks to Mr. Cheap at Financial Security Quest for helping me get the Canadian flag into the header, as well as Canadian Capitalist for providing the .gif file.

On with the post!

This article from the Globe & Mail talks about a recently released Bank of Canada study recommends getting rid of the lowly penny which I couldn’t agree with more. The study determined that the penny isn’t necessary when the average day’s net pay reached $100 which is in accordance with a model created in Britain based on the relationship between the average day’s net pay and a currency’s denomination structure.

Interestingly enough the Department of Finance said there is still significant demand for pennies but an internal memo indicates that this “demand” is really the effect of people hoarding the pennies and fewer are recirculated.

Personally I can’t stand using pennies because they are so useless and time consuming. I always end up with jars and jars of them and have to spend all kinds of time rolling them. Does anybody really care if milk cost $4.99 vs $5.00? Also a report by Desjardins Group says that pennies are costing Canada at least $130 million per year.

Australia, New Zealand, France, Norway and Britain have all eliminated their lowest denomination coins so it can be done. I’m sure there are people who want to keep the penny around for sentimental reasons or possibly because they like holding up the grocery store line while they search around their giant purse for that last penny, but I think it should go. And while we’re cleaning house, maybe the nickel can be tossed out as well.

Categories
Investing

Chasing China

One of the things I’ve read in many investment books and articles is that you should create an investment plan, write it down if necessary and stick with it regardless of what happens in the markets. At this point I don’t have a finalized investment plan set in stone, but one of the negative investment behaviours that I’ve identified in my investment past is chasing returns.

Chasing returns usually refers to the activity of switching from a poorly performing (or average performing) investment into one that has an extraodinary recent return. This kind of investment philosophy is probably the quickest way into the poorhouse. It’s been proven in many studies that funds that perform very well in the short term rarely continue that success.

Last fall I purchased some units of a China mutual fund. At this point in time I was already on my way to becoming a low cost diy passive investor but for some reason I thought I should catch a short ride on the China express. As it turns out the fund actually went up about 20% over two months after I bought it which is a pretty incredible return. Towards the end of January this year I made the decision to sell the fund because I decided that the fund was too risky and was not the type of investment I wanted to own plus the reason I bought it was because I was chasing returns which I didn’t want to do anymore.

I figure that if I do the passive investing method properly then I could set myself up for a good retirement and I didn’t need to try for any home runs along the way. This new Canadian blog explains this baseball analogy much better than I ever could.

Since I sold the fund, it has bounced around quite a bit and currently stands at about 10% above where I sold it. In the past I would have been steamed that I had “lost out” on that 10% gains but now I honestly don’t care.