Categories
Book Review

Money of the Mind – Book Review

I’m off on holiday for the next week so there will be no posts until Monday, July 23.

On with the review…

This rather long book by James Grant is another in Bernstein’s recommended reading list which I am determined to work through.

Basically this book is about the history of American banking from around 1850 to the mid-1980s. I found the first half quite fascinating as it detailed the “wild west” of banking in the 1800’s with numerous bank runs, bank failures, bank startups and lots of colourful characters. The book explains that before the US government had a federal currency, each bank would print its own currency (backed by gold) and people would trade the currencies at some relation to par value based on how solvent they thought the bank was or how far away the bank was. The other thing I learned was that personal bank loans were not made popular until the 1920’s. Before that banks only lent to people and businesses “who didn’t really need the money”. Real estate loans were another item that proper banks didn’t stoop to. Perhaps way back when, real estate values were not as well defined as they are today?

The second half of the book I found quite boring as it kept moving further along in history into the 1980s but using the same ideas that banks would go overboard with lending in the good times and then get too conservative after a crash. Without the historical aspect I just wasn’t interested. I recommend reading this book but if you get to a point where it starts to get boring then just put it down – you’ve gotten all you’re going to get out of it at that point.

Categories
Investing

Design an American’s Retirement Account

I have a good friend who lives in the states who is looking to get serious about her retirement saving. She wants to put about $250 / month into a 403K (tax sheltered retirement savings at a non-profit, like a 401K or an RRSP). She’s read some investing books, but isn’t really interested in the subject and often finds them confusing.

She’s been looking for a vehicle she can set up, pay into every month and ignore (with as little monthly / annual maintenance as possible). She’ll be looking to start cashing it in when she retires in 3 decades or so.

Originally I was advocating buying “dividend aristocrats” that have a high yield, but obviously this takes research and more of an ongoing awareness (how are the businesses you own doing these days?). Also, there’s definitely a risk in having your retirement savings concentrated on a handful of companies (even if they’re great long-term companies).

Instead, I’ve recommended Vanguard’s Balanced Fund (60% equities in broad US market index, 40% bond funds – 0.2% MER, 9.34% average return over the last 5 year) as a way to put money away, not worry about it, and expect to have a nice nest egg to retire from. She would buy this on auto-pilot, and ignore it.

Given that the bulk of this blog’s readers are clearly smarter then I am, would you agree with this recommendation? Any alternatives you’d encourage her to consider? For Canadians, what would your retirement savings look like if you lived in America?

Categories
Personal Finance

How to Predict the Future Part 2

As discussed yesterday, we laid out a retirement calculation for Bob, and concluded that he won’t have enough money to reach his desired gross income of $45k in today’s dollars.

What to do? Well either Bob can cut out a few lattes and spa treatments in retirement or he increases his annual contributions or he works a few more years or some combination of all three. The spreadsheet linked below, shows in the first tab named “increase contributions” that he would have to increase his contributions in today’s dollars from $10k to about $19k in order to meet his requirement of $45k in retirement. This amount of contribution probably isn’t realistic given that it’s a huge increase and if he has to double his contribution then he probably has to cut back a lot on his pre-retirement life which might affect his desired spending in retirement. For example if he can live on less money while working then he can live on less money on retirement.

The next two alternatives cover the options if he wants to work later or wants to reduce retirement income.

The second spreadsheet tab named “work longer” – Bob decides that that he can’t live without the lattes and spas either before or after retirement so the only other option is to work longer than age 60. In this case he need $1.1 million in today’s dollars to meet his requirements and has to work until the end of the year in which he turns 65 to fulfill this scenario.

In the last example named “compromise” – Bob says that he can cut some expenses so he will only require $40k in retirement, he will contribute $14k per year but still wants to retire by age 60 – in this case he will have a gross income of $40,690 upon retirement.

So to sum up, Bob can keep his $45k gross income requirement in retirement but he has to work an extra five years to age 65 or increase his contribution from $10k to $19k. Another solution is to work to age 60, increase his contribution to $14k and live on just over $40k in retirement.

Some future posts will deal with more realistic retirement scenarios. If there are two parties involved, Canada Pension Plan, OAS, pension income, and taxes then the scenario becomes a bit more complicated but it’s still relatively easy to calculate.

How to Predict the Future Part I

Retirement SpreadSheet

Categories
Opinion

Cult of the Expert

Our society loves experts.

We love investing experts, real estate gurus, all-knowing professors, benevolent leaders and kung-fu masters. We like to think there are people out there, such as the Professor on Gilligan’s island, who can take our problem and devise a masterful solution. Almost every story in our culture glorifies this concept.

Jack Baur on 24 is pretty well super-human. Why he isn’t running the world from a mountain lair is beyond me. Maybe because everyone else on the show is super-human too. Each crew member on each of the starship enterprises routinely performs miracles. It seems to be part of the recruiting requirements at starfleet academy. All the way back to Odysseus we like to read / hear about people who are pretty darn remarkable.

In reality, there isn’t a single soldier in the world who is anywhere near Jack’s level. No engineer is anywhere near as good as Scotty or La Forge and most sailors would have a hard time dealing with a single cyclops (let along a bunch of them).

Certain professions tap into this desire to believe in heroes. Lawyers, doctors and real estate agents continually try to convince society that they have abilities and knowledge that are unattainable (and incomprehensible) to us and we need to just turn our lives (and our money) over to them.

Robert Heinlein wrote:

A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.

As Heinlein encourages us, we can defend ourselves in a court of law, help someone who is sick or sell a property ourselves. Of course there would be extreme situations where it would be worth seeking help (performing brain surgery on your wife might not be the best idea, although it might give you a chance to defend yourself in court), but anyone with a brain in their head can (and should) handle routine matters in these areas on their own.

Clearly the reason why these professions want to scare us into putting them up on a pedestal is to ensure their own economic well being. Its bloody hard to create a monopoly on a profession, but a few of them have managed it. As I, and others, have wrote before, no one will care more about your well-being than you, so you owe it to yourself to put the best person on the job (and usually that’ll be you).

Some time ago I pulled some of my thoughts together about real estate agents. An agent showed up and offered to “explain how a buyers agreement benefits the buyer”. It is insulting that someone would have the gall to pretend that an legal agreement that binds us to them as an exclusive supplier benefits *US*. Any agent who would try to feed you that bull clearly thinks you’re an idiot (and why do business with someone who has such a low perception of you?).

If you’ve read this far, you’re clearly in the group of people with brains in their head. If you’re already doing things for yourself, I commend you on your courage and intelligence. If you’re not, I encourage you to learn and try more. You have the capability to do it. I believe in you!

Categories
Personal Finance

How to Predict the Future Part 1

That’s right – predict the future! Ok, this method won’t help with lottery tickets, horse racing, stock prices or anything else that will make you rich quick, however it does apply to retirement planning, particularly with predicting the future values of your retirement income and retirement expenses which of course is all you need to calculate to predict your retirement. Planning your retirement is not as simple as tying your shoes but it’s not so complicated that you have to pay an advisor thousands of dollars to figure it out for you.

Everyone has heard all the scary stories about how you will need one million dollars to retire, or two million…or whatever. These numbers sound unreachable for someone who might only have a retirement portfolio of $100k (or no retirement portfolio for that matter) but it’s important to remember that these are future dollars. One million dollars in twenty years is the equivalent to $560,613 dollars right now assuming 3% inflation. This is admittedly still a large number but it’s a lot less than a million dollars.

In the past, to calculate my retirement scenario, I had assembled a complex retirement spreadsheet that involved using the future value of all contributions, withdrawals, taxes, income etc. This worked reasonably well except that it was complicated and didn’t lend itself to change very easily. One of the things I learned from Four Pillars of Investing was to calculate retirement scenarios using today’s dollars to greatly simplify things. The way this is accomplished is to subtract your estimated inflation rate from your estimated portfolio return to get a “real return” and to use today’s dollars for everything else such as portfolio contributions and anticipated withdrawals.

I’ve created a relatively simple retirement scenario in the spreadsheet below, which is for someone (Bob) who is turning 40 this year, has a $250k portfolio and contributes $10k per year. He desires $45k of gross income in retirement at age 60. His expected investment return is 7% but I will subtract 3% inflation to get a real return of 4%. We will also assume that he will get no other income other than from this portfolio and that contributions are made at the end of the year. He will retire at the end of the year in which he turns 60. The goal of this exercise is to determine if he is contributing enough to meet his goal of $45k (in today’s dollars) gross income in retirement. We will also use the “4% rule” which basically states that the initial annual withdrawal from a retirement portfolio should be 4% of the portfolio. This will be discussed in many future posts as it is a particular favourite subject of mine!

If you check out the spreadsheet you will note some interesting things. By age 60 his $250k portfolio has grown to $889k in today’s dollars. Twenty years from now that portfolio will actually be $1,654,516 in year 2027 dollars. This sounds like an incredible amount but it isn’t enough to meet the Bob’s requirement of $45k gross income in today’s dollars. I calculate the portfolio each year by multiplying the previous year value by 1.04 and adding the contribution to that.

As you can see at the bottom of the sheet, 4% of $845k is only $35,575 which falls far short of Bob’s expected gross income.

Tomorrow we will look at a couple of solutions for Bob so he can achieve his goals.

How to Predict the Future Part II

Retirement I

Categories
Frugal

Frugal vs Cheap

While digging through the I Will Teach You To Be Rich archives, I came across an interesting post about Cheap versus Frugal.

Although I am *MISTER* cheap, I’m actually quite hurt when someone I care about says something that implies I’m cheap. Amusingly, I actually don’t mind if they CALL me cheap. An insight about me that a friend once had was that I’m “generous to other people but not to myself”, which I think has a good deal of truth to it. I’m certainly not Mr. Stingy.

I agree with Ramit that frugal people focus on value, while cheap people focus on price. I *NEVER* expect anyone to foot the bill for me (and err on the side of giving more myself to be sure that this never happens).

Overall I think being frugal is one of the greatest virtues. It involves soul-searching and an understanding of yourself and your environment in an effort to ensure that your resources are distributed in line with your values.

Who could complain about that?

Categories
Personal Finance

Save Costs on Traffic Tickets

Ever get a traffic ticket and just paid the full fine and accepted the points? If you wanted to try fighting or reducing the ticket, there’s always been the option of booking a court case and showing up and either pleading down the ticket with the assistant DA or actually going to trial and hope the cop doesn’t show up. Both of these methods can be successful but they can take up a lot of time and be somewhat stressful – especially if you’ve never been on trial before.

Well my wife got a ticket last year and decided to take advantage of the City of Toronto Court Services process in which you can “plead guilty with an explanation” and basically plead down the ticket with the assistant DA. Actually the cop who gave her the ticket told her to go and plead it down.

According to the website it sounds like a quick easy process, but in practice she showed up and got a number (you have to line up to get the number first). The room was hot and crowded. After about a one hour wait she talked to the customer service rep. Then she went into another room (through security) and waited longer to talk to the assistant DA. Once that talk was over she waited some more and then got a sheet from the assistant DA with the new deal – then she went back to the first room and got another number and waited to pay – this was a different line so it didn’t take long.

Bottom line is that she was there about 2.5 hours, got the ticket reduced from $110 to $80 but she paid $20 for parking so net savings (not counting gas & lunch) was $10. The two points were removed which apparently is the main thing. I’m not sure if two demerit points has any effect on your insurance but I guess if you keep getting them then your insurance will go up.

Tip #1- If you are doing this and are going to the downtown Toronto court then go before nine in order to get the early bird parking which is only $10. It gets crowded later in the day as well so earlier is better

Tip #2 – Don’t bring your young child with you (if you have one).

Tip #3 – Since you have to go through security, don’t bring any knives or Swiss army knife key chains.

Categories
Personal Finance

An Open Letter to ING Direct Canada

Please note!

To get a $25 bonus with a new ING account then use the referral code 33089336S1.  This is also called the  orange key code.

To the guy with the accent and his two curvy henchmen:

To begin with I’d like to thank you for entering, and shaking up, the Canadian banking industry. When I first heard about you, in 1997, I thought “what a great idea” and was happy to open an account with you. I was delighted to refer friends and family to you, and the referral bonuses you offered were a cherry on top of the sundae.

People were reluctant to bank with an entirely Internet based bank. I understood that concern, and did my best to reassure them that you wouldn’t run away with their money in the middle of the night (and you haven’t). Showing them that you are FDIC insured, just like the big banks went a long way to reassuring them. The fact that you offered higher interest rates on your SAVINGS ACCOUNT then the big banks offered for GICs went a long way to getting them to switch.

I was working down in the US in 2000 and evangelized you south of the border too.

As a banking revolutionary, I salute you. Unfortunately you seem to have recently lost the fire in your belly.

When PC Financial opened its doors, I was suspicious at first. I assumed that their higher rates would be mere teasers and expected within a couple of months for them to drop below yours. I was perplexed when months went by and they stayed higher than ING Direct. Your commercials kept playing, telling us to keep our money and get paid top interest, but they started to ring false in the face of the ongoing interest rate disparity.

In December of 2006 I applied to you for an un-mortgage. Being self-employed, I expected that it might be a little tougher to arrange, but we’d been together for so long, I expected it would happen one way or another. In the end your representative turned me away completely (not even offering a mortgage with a high down-payment or higher interest rates, just a refusal to do business with me). That same week both PC Financial and Scotiabank offered me mortgages.

You’ve changed man. You used to be about turning the bank industry on it heads and connecting with the littler guy. You streamlined your operations and passed the savings on to us. Now you’re turning your back on us, at exactly the time PC Financial is welcoming us with open arms.

My last GIC at ING direct came due in May, and after moving the money from it, there’s a sad 56 cents sitting in my ING Direct account. I hope the winter that has fallen on the orange giant thaws, and on that day I’ll happily return (although sadly you’ll have to outdo PC Financial now, when before all you had to do was match them to keep me).

Please let all the drained accounts sitting with pennies in them be the sparks that re-ignites your belly fire. Become what you were in 1997 again: charge into battle again. For your shareholders, yes, but for us little guys too!