Categories
Personal Finance

Professional Beggars

I’ve written about begging before.  As long term readers can probably guess, I’m fairly opposed to it (heck, I’ll even tell people off for begging in “World of Warcraft”).  Aggressive panhandlers are one thing, but at least their actions are usually motivated by a personal and immediate need.  Others have actually chosen begging as a career, and often make very good salaries doing so (or managing other people who do it on their behalf).

The brother of a family friend does fund raising for universities.  He basically hooks up with a school, and is given the mandate to boost donations from alumni.  He’s paid 10% of whatever he raises for the school (and is given a staff to help him with marketing, calling alumni, etc).  This can certainly rub people the wrong way (when they make a donation, they probably don’t realize that 10%+ is being taken off of the top to pay this guy), but from the university’s perspective, they’re way ahead (even after giving him his cut) if he can dramatically increase the donations.

dd-sick-kidsAt the beginning of the year Michael O’Mahoney left his job as the head of the “Sick Kids” fundraising arm, a position which paid $624,103 in salary and benefits.  Anyone who has spent time downtown in Toronto has seen the Sick Kid canvassers, who flank a sidewalk in pairs making it impossible to walk past without being solicited from one of them.  It’s pretty had to get angry at people fund raising for children who are ill, and to their credit they aren’t pushy at all, but it’s always bothered me that these young kids are being paid to shake down pedestrians.  Friends have insisted to me that they’re volunteers, not paid employees, but after I looked into it (I asked them on the street and looked on-line) it became quite clear that they are paid – currently starting at $12 / hour.

It has been so successful that recently the Red Cross has adopted a similar campaign here in KW (shaking down employees outside of RIM).  I suspect in the current economic climate, a number of students would be tempted to do this as a summer job – $12 / hour is a lot better than they’d be earning at fast food or doing yard work.

When I was a child my mother used to go door-to-door collecting for the CNIB (her grandmother was blind and glaucoma runs in the family).  This was begging as well, but I feel more comfortable with her doing this as a volunteer than someone being paid to do so. Even if someone supports being paid to fund raise, should people be getting rich doing so? (as in the case with 10% of school donations or an annual salary that’s more than 1/2 a million dollars).  I’m pretty sure this would bother many donors.

One of my math teachers in high school (a raging Scot) ranted one time about how he wouldn’t let his daughter participate in school fund raising activities because he didn’t want her “begging from the neighbours”.  The same guy compared an annual all-school hockey tournament to Nazi Germany, so at the time I thought he was a few cards short of a deck.  As I’ve gotten older, I’ve come to appreciate his perspective, and I think I’d be reluctant to allow my children to participate for the same reasons.

A friend of mine donated to Sick Kids the first time he encountered them on the street.  After he gave them $20, he was subjected to a continuous stream of requests for more money (phone calls, letters, etc).  He figures they quickly burned through the $20 trying to get more money out of him and he eventually insisted they take him off of all their lists as he was sick of being disturbed (and has said he’ll never donate to them again).

In late 2006 a scandal erupted with the Canadian arm of Mothers Against Drunk Driving that they were using almost all the funds raised to pay salaries and fuel additional fund raising activities with very little going to actually combat drunk driving.  My experience with non-profits has sadly been that this isn’t terribly unusual.  Good intentions are considered worth as much as actually accomplishing something.

“The Road to Hell: The Ravaging Effects of Foreign Aid and International Charity” by Michael Maren is an amazing book that details his desperate attempts to do good work in Africa, while being confronted with the reality that his work either was ineffective or actually harmful to the people he wanted to help (and was subverted for the benefit of those in power at the NPOs and in the African nations).

Do you donate money to charitable causes?  If you do, how do you ensure that your donation will be used effectively?  How do you pick where to donate?  Do you think it is reasonable for people to be paid for fund raising?

Categories
Personal Finance

Got My RBC 1% Rebate – Switch Back To Questrade?

I received notice in the mail recently that the RBC 1% rebate has been paid out in all our 4 accounts that I moved their last year to take advantage of their 1% rebate deal.  Basically the offer was that if you transferred any money from other brokerages to RBC they would pay you 1% of the value of the assets.  Of course you had to wait for the money – I didn’t receive mine until June of this year so they make sure you can’t just transfer the money, get the rebate and transfer out which makes sense.  I only wish they had paid the 1% on current asset value and not the value as of last year which was lower.  Given that the transfer involved about 2-3 hours work in total, it was well worth the effort.

Now that the rebate has been paid I can either stay with RBC (not!) or switch back to Questrade discount brokerage since I rather like them.

Did anyone else take advantage of this deal?  Are you staying with RBC or switching to another discount broker?

If you are planning to move back to Questrade then read about the Returning to Questrade deal on transfer fees.

Categories
Real Estate

Slumlords

It wasn’t long after I’d bought my investment condo that I was called a slumlord for the first time (jokingly by a friend’s father).  I think most people who rent out real estate get called this at one point or another, and it’s a popular view of people in the business of providing housing.

A slumlord is a property owner who rents the property “as is” to poor tenants, then provides minimal (or no) maintenance to the unit (while doing everything possible to collect rent).  In some ways I feel that my current landlord is a bit of a slum lord (it took her 2.5 months to replace a broken dryer, after MANY messages from myself and the other tenants, and she blew me off when I had a insect infestation shortly after I first moved in).

PERSONALLY, I wouldn’t be interested in offering this type of housing, but in many ways I don’t have a problem with those who do.  Anyone who can afford properly maintained housing will do so.  The slumlord offers low-cost housing to people with low-income or poor credit.  As a tenant, I could certainly pay more and get a nicer place, but I’d rather have lower rent (and am willing to accept a “less responsive” landlord).

Many governments in developed countries have made typical slumlord behaviours illegal, which led to landlords not offering housing to tenants who would typically be renting such accommodations.  The reaction to this was to then offer incentives to get landlords to provide such house (Section 8 in the US, or the Canada-Ontario Affordable Housing Program in my neck of the woods).

There is a desire that the poor be provided with middle-class style accommodations, which is fine as a desire, but for this to happen SOMEONE has to pay the difference in the rent rates.  Either it will be landlords (losing money on low income tenants), or the tax payers (in the case of Section 8 style programs or community housing).  Since it’s difficult to force people to become / remain landlords if they don’t want to (they’ll just move capital to more lucrative investments if housing becomes over-regulated) the tendency is for these things to become an entrenched part of the bureaucracy.

W5 (a Canadian investigative news program) did a show called “Canada’s worst landlord” (links to video from the actual program on the right hand side), which was about Toronto Community Housing (where a friend of a friend works).  They are able to provide disgusting conditions for their tenants which would never be tolerated if it was an individual or company providing them, but *is* tolerated because it’s government housing.  Unfortunately I think this is the inevitable direction community housing drifts in.

Because there’s such a dim view of slumlords (and the term is applied so broadly) and regulations, I can’t understand why ANYONE investing in real estate offers low-income housing.  The tenants will often have time and resources (free legal aid and whatnot) to enter into disputes with you, the law often provides them with a great deal of protection (which is often one-sided), and society won’t even appreciate the service you are providing (I’ve never heard of anyone being lauded for providing low-income housing, the view is usually that they’re exploiting the poor).  By targetting middle / upper class tenants you avoid these issues entirely.

The counter-argument would be that since it is a pain-in-the-butt, fewer investors will be trying to purchase such properties (or offer them for rent) and it will be a more lucrative investment.  I have my doubts overall, but even if that was the case, it wouldn’t be a worthwhile trade-off for me.

Do you have any slumlord experiences?  If you were investing in real estate, would you consider offering low-income housing?  Do you have any personal experiences (good or bad) doing so?

Categories
Real Estate

Small Scale Landlords

I was in Tim Horton’s recently, and overheard two men talking.  One of them was saying “I got cash from him in the first month, but I haven’t gotten anything since then.”  Perking up at a real estate discussion, I casually eavesdropped.  They were on their way out, but I heard him continue saying “I don’t even know if the name he gave me is a real name.  I’ve never seen any I.D. or his student records or anything…”

Sadly this is quite common: someone decides to get into land lording, perhaps renting out a room in their house, or converting their basement into a small apartment.  Figuring that they’re operating on such a small scale, they throw caution to the wind and rent based on their gut feeling.  People follow a similar approach with subletting, reasoning “I’m not a landlord, I’m just subletting my apartment.”

Although there are *SOME* *SMALL* legal difference based on the number of units in a building, for the most part when you start selling housing to someone you’re a landlord. All the standard legal protections for tenants apply.  If you’re subletting your apartment and something happens, you will be in the middle of the situation. If you’re renting out part of your house and they turn into a bad tenant, it’s just as bad as a tenant in a typical apartment, except they’re LIVING WITH YOU! Whatever the situation is for the Tim Horton’s guy, I find it SHOCKING that he would rent to someone without even verifying their identity.

Since most of The Residential Tenancies Act applies to them, it is well worth landlords (and soon-to-be-landlords) to review it.  Many of the expectations some people have (such as “it’s my house, I can make whatever rules I want!”) are explicitly rejected.  I’m positive it’s a joke, but Krystal at Give Me Back My Five Dollars posted an amusing example of this sort of thing.

Two married friends of mine bought a house a year ago, and have been renovating the basement to rent out as a student apartment.  The wife has been asking me for advice, and is trying her best to make the best possible decisions.  The husband has been acting from a place of anxiety, and just wants to get someone in and paying rent as soon as possible.  I’ve warned him that a bad tenant is worse than no tenant, but he feels pressured to get rent checks coming in soon.

I think often people who end up renting out part of their houses want the rent, but they don’t want the tenant.  They figure there’s some way they can make enough rules that the tenant will be so inconspicuous (until rent is due) that it’ll almost be like they’re living without a tenant. When I was first looking for a place to rent at the start of my Masters, I looked at homes where people were renting out rooms. Without fail, I found that each one had the attitude “I want your rent, but I don’t really want you living here”. One landlord complained about the current tenant having a boyfriend spend the night without asking his permission, and another told me the place was air conditioned, but HE would decide when the AC was on or off.

It doesn’t work this way. If someone is paying money to rent a place, they rightfully expect to be able to live there (ideally without a tyrant telling them 500 things they can and can’t do). It’s not a universally agreed upon perspective, but I view my tenants as customers. I won’t be able to say yes to EVERY request they make, but I certainly want them to be happy in their tenancy (and hopefully remain for as long as possible).

I’m not sure that Ontario has the right balance, but a tenancy agreement *IS* a legal contract, and the rights of both parties need to be protected.  In Ontario, and in most other places, legal protections ARE automatically put in place (even if there isn’t a written contract.  These need to be understood, even when property owner doesn’t view the rental situation they’re offering as “that serious”.

Categories
Announcements

LinkStuff For July 8

Just a few links this week since I’m not able to get on the internet much this week.

The best links

Amateur Asset Allocator says that Buffett’s record doesn’t mean that the efficient market hypothesis is wrong.

Thicken My Wallet had 2 great posts

Joe TaxPayer wrote about the Dave Ramsey debt snowball and some issues with it.  His post was inspired by my post on the topic which is pretty cool (although I think he would have written it anyways.  I would encourage the regular readers to check Joe out – his thoughts are pretty similar to Mr. Cheap and I so you might like his blog.

The rest

Money Ning will tell you how to be a millionaire.

Good Financial Cents talls us how to avoid investment fraud.

Canadian Capitalist had an interesting post on the 5 cent grocery bag levy.  Lots of comments too.

Investing School talks about diversification.

ABCs of Investing warns that not all ETFs and index funds are diversified and how different types of stock market indexes work.

Carnivals

Carnival of Money Hacks

1031 Exchange Carnival

Carnival of Investing Strategies

Economy and Your Finances Carnival

Festival of Stocks

Bankruptcy and Debt Carnival

Carnival of 20 Something Finances

Festival of Frugality

Categories
Personal Finance

Negotiations Within Ongoing Relationships

As a quick clarification, the “relationships” in this title refers to any people who have an ongoing association with each other, not exclusively romantic relationships.

Thicken My Wallet recently wrote a great post on negotiation which addresses negotiation where you have an ongoing relationship with the other party.  Most of my negotiation posts have dealt with “one off” transactions where you never expect to do business with the person again.  It’s definitely a different game when you keep interacting after the deal is done.

In game theory, they take a mathematical approach to strategic situations (where your best action depends on the actions of others).  The answer changes dramatically whether it’s a single iteration game, or a multiple iteration game.

Years ago I got working at a software consulting company (other companies would hire them to develop software).  During the negotiations the owner played all sorts of games with me.  One that he managed to pull off was he described the position as a “Java developer” role, and twice said “there are a couple projects in the works, so we don’t know EXACTLY which you’ll be working on when you first start”.  At the time, I didn’t pay much attention to this, but it turned out (once I’d signed the contract) that rather than doing development, they were going to have me doing application work for 6 months.  This is fine for what it is, but the consequence for me is that I would lose 6 months of skill development (I would be learning completely non-transferable skills for using that specific software application:  something I had no interest in, which he realized and why he downplayed it).  Before me they’d had a high school student working on it, so that gives an idea of how “challenging” the work was (but they needed it done, which is fair from a business perspective).

Tricking me into working on something other than what I’d expected turned out to be a very costly mistake for both of us.  I *MAY* have still accepted the job if they’d been upfront about what I’d be doing, told me that was what the business needed at that time, and given me a firm commitment WHEN I’d get back to doing the work I actually wanted to do.  As it played out, I couldn’t get over the fact that they’d pulled a bait-and-switch on me, and they remained unrepentant (with the owner repeatedly telling me he’s a sales guy so he naturally “puts the best spin on things”).  By the time we went our separate ways, they’d wasted a lot of money bringing me on board, and I’d wasted a lot of time finding and getting up to speed in a position which wasn’t a good fit for me.  Since then I won’t take a job if they can’t tell me EXACTLY what I’ll be working on day-one (and most companies have been able to tell me this – why would they be hiring someone if they don’t know what for?).

I’m constantly amazed how hard organizations haggle with employees over hirings and raises, and they don’t seem to factor in that they will have to work with this person for the period of their employement.  I’ve been treated rudely by people involved in the hiring at a number of organizations, and it blows my mind that they’d jeopardize me as a potential employee over something as silly as bad manners.  One interview I went to there were three men and two of them kept surfing on a notebook and whispering back and forth during the interview.  They asked me back for another round, and I declined, telling them if they couldn’t be bothered to give me their attention during an interview, I didn’t want to work with them.

People who are really strong hagglers / negotiators can get themselves in trouble if they keep getting good deals off of friends and family.  You might be able to convince the wife to do the dishes 4 nights in a row, but the fact that she agrees doesn’t mean she’s going to be happy about it.  It saddens me to see marriages degenerate into a state of war, where each disagreement becomes a battle, and winning the battle just causes more problems down the road.  Eventually both sides lose when the relationship can’t handle any more strain and is dissolved.

Recently I was talking to a friend-of-a-friend who is involved locally in real estate.  I’d asked him for a copy of the “offer to purchase” he’d last used when he bought a property without an agent.  He was willing to give me a copy, but wanted me to take him out to a fancy restaurant in exchange (with $35 entrees and $50 bottles of wine).  Rather than going out for a $150+ dinner, I just bought an offer to purchase at the book store for $15.  A month later, he told me he was going to be out of town and asked if I could show one of his properties for him.  Unsurprisingly, I wasn’t able to make the time to help him out.  He tried to get a killer good deal out of me for a copy of an offer to purchase, and burned the relationship with someone local who was familiar with real estate investing.

Some salespeople (real estate agents particularly like to do this) will try to sell themselves as focusing on the long term relationship (with the implicit commitment that they’ll give you a fair deal because they want to do business in the future and get referrals from you).  My experience has been that they realize they aren’t guaranteed future business or referrals and will (rationally) push to get the best deal for themselves in each transaction.  I don’t blame them for this, but it irks me when they pretend that they’re advisers (instead of salespeople) and are investing in the relationship (when they’re maximizing their short term benefit).

As Thicken My Wallet suggests in his posts, there are times when a negotiation is a one-off deal.  Other times you’re going to keep interacting with the person in the future.  When you’re going to have future interactions, it doesn’t mean you have to give them everything they want.  Instead, factor that value of these future interactions into the negotiations, and make sure that you aren’t pushing for a good short term benefit (that will cost you over the long term).

Have you had any experiences where people pushed hard for the best immediate deal and it hurt them long term?

Categories
Personal Finance

4 Hot Stocks To Buy In 2009 Competition Update

I entered into a stock picking competition with a number of other bloggers at the beginning of this year.   I picked four small oil-related companies as part of my “swing for the fences” strategy.  So far it has paid off since my portfolio is up over 40% for the year.  In the last stock picks update I was in first place thanks to the surprising strength of oil prices.  Regrettably my performance has dropped off a bit and a couple of my competitors have picked up their socks.  Regardless, I’m still in 3rd so I’m happy with that.

The rankings

IntelligentSpeculator 73.05%
WildInvestor 56.78%
FourPillars 44.26%
Wheredoesallmymoneygo 43.01%
The Financial Blogger 24.49%
Dividend Growth Investor 11.51%
Million Dollar Journey 8.49%
MyTradersJournal -3.16%
ZachStocks -13.17%

Here are my stock picks and purchase price and (Oct 1 close)

BCF.to – Bronco Energy $1.27  ($0.76)

HOC.to – Heritage Corp $3.65   ($8.31)

TOG.to – TriStar Oil and Gas $11.41  ($15.38)

CLL.to – Connacher Oil Gas $0.74  ($1.06)

Categories
Book Review

Book Review: Writing Nonfiction: Turning Thoughts into Books

In John Reed’s “How to Write, Publish & Sell Your Own How-To Book” he refers to Dan Poynter’s work repeatedly. In my review of that book, Tim from Canadian Dream also directed me to Poynter, so when my local library had a copy of his “Writing Nonfiction: Turning Thoughts into Books” I had to check it out.

Writing a book fits with the audience of Four Pillars in a number of ways. It is an often cited example of “passive income“. Blogging in many ways is the evolution of publishing newsletters, columns, articles and books (I suspect most bloggers harbour a secret desire to write a book). It is also an excellent component of any business development strategy (either blogging or publishing a book).

While Reed clearly makes a decent living from writing, he also isn’t getting as fabulously rich as his level of fame might suggest. I imagine it’s similar with Poynter. Two articles I read recently that made a lot of sense to me are: “A Reality Check About Blogging For Money” and “Reality check: You’re not going to make money from your blog“. These articles present a fairly convincing case that blogging will rarely lead directly to “living wage” level income. Instead it’s a way (like writing a book) to establish your expertise in an area, which can then be leveraged for something that actually will make money.

I’ve been really impressed with Squawkfox and how she’s taken her blog to the level that she got a publishing contract (and is now appearing on every Canadian media outlet – I’m just waiting until they get her to announce “Hockey Night in Canada”). I’m not sure where this will all lead for her, but I hope it’s somewhere great and lasting. She showed her “writing chops” on her blog and got noticed by a publisher, which has lead to a book that has gotten her noticed by Canadians. Maybe she’ll become the Canadian version of Suze Orman… Writing a book can be a deliberate attempt at creating the same sort of exposure for a project. I imagine it would also be quite powerful for career building: if you’ve published a known book in the field you’re working in, there should be little doubt about your expertise in potential employers.

Getting back to the review, while in theory they cover the same topic (writing a nonfiction / how-to book) Poynter’s book is very different from Reed’s, and the two compliment each other quite well. This book provides a “nuts-and-bolts” guide to get from a general desire to write a book to having a published book sitting on your desk (and in bookstores, which is also a different objective than Reed’s self-publishing book).

At the start of the book Dan Poynter iterates all the benefits of being a published author. This leads in to a discussion of how technology has changed the publishing process and presents a convincing picture that it is worthwhile to write and publish a book, and it has never been easier. He gives detailed advice on how to select a topic for a book, how to research the market (and evaluate competing titles). This is followed up by an explanation of all the parts of a published book (such as ISBN numbers and forwards), which are necessary, and how to produce each.

While Reed’s book glossed over the actual writing (he basically said just write it), Poynter has some great suggestions for getting the content in shape and for the revision process. One of my favourite ideas is to use a binder as a “working version” of your book. While you’ll obviously do the writing and typesetting with a computer program (like Microsoft Word or Open Office), you also print out a working copy and assemble it in a binder (separating out chapters). This even has a cover, spine and back page which are all mock-ups of the current version of your book. The suggestion is to carry this wherever you go, and use it to make revisions. You get to see your book coming together as the parts of the binder get filled in.

Another excellent part of this book is his treatment of enlisting help from others. He recommends that you get experts to review a CHAPTER of your book, rather than dumping the whole thing on them (he claims many more people are willing to provide feedback on a portion of the work, if they don’t have to read the whole thing). This has the added benefit of being able to target very specifically who you ask for what. If I was writing a personal finance book, and if there was a chapter dealing with RRSP, the first person I’d go to would be Preet (he, literally, wrote the book on RRSPs [non-affiliate link]). He may or may not have time to read through it and provide feedback, but he’d probably be a lot more willing to look at 18 pages than 144.

Poynter strongly suggests 144 pages as the length for a book (apparently printing is typically done in multiples of 48). Our blog posts are often around 1000 words, (and each page of Poynter’s book looks like it’s around 500 words), which makes a book seem a lot more doable (it would be about the equivalent of 72 blog posts).

He also provides good advice on how to solicit “celebrity blurbs” for the back cover and ad copy (the basic idea is to take a risk and ask, and to write a first draft to make it as easy for them as possible).

There is a bit at the end about finding an agent or publisher. This boils down to his suggestion not to send unsolicited manuscripts, and instead to try to talk to a publish or agent who specializes in your type of book (and if you’re talking to one who doesn’t, try to get a referral to one who does).

Overall I’d highly recommend this book for anyone thinking about writing nonfiction. It has a large amount of useful information that isn’t in Reed’s book (and vice versa) and, as stated above, the two compliment each other quite well.