Categories
Investing

How to Get a 49,250% Return On Investment

At the end of this post there will be a technique for getting a MASSIVE ROI on your investment.  Truth be told, this can be pushed a little further and get an infinite ROI.  Much like having to eat your vegetables before desert, you’re not allowed to skip to the end of the post (and if you do, in fact, do so, I guarantee it will make baby Jesus cry – baby Mohammed and baby Moses will be rather annoyed too, but they aren’t the crybabies Jesus is).

I’ve written before about how important I think measurement is.  To just go by your gut in the investment world is INSANE (I guess this would be called gambling).  The pendulum can swing too far in the other direction where people start believing that metrics provide more information than they really do.  One example of this is the much maligned Value at Risk (VAR) which has been said to have lead to the subprime meltdown.    I don’t feel that VAR as a measurement is inherently bad, or that CDOs are evil (to me that’s like saying a rock is evil, what does that even mean?).  I just think both were misused in ways that lead to very large problems.

Many rookie real estate investors are attracted to the idea of “no money down”.  They’re focusing on one particular part of the deal (the downpayment) and judging the ENTIRE deal by it (lower is better).  The deal must be judged as a whole, not just by one factor (it is VERY easy to lose LOTS of money on a no money down deal, in fact it can be easy to argue that they’re pretty hard to make money on).  In the linked-to article, John T. Reed argues that profit is a better number to focus on than the down payment.

Even focusing on profit has many pitfalls.  Say I offer you a deal that’ll give you a 100% profit in 1 week.  Sounds good?  The only catch is there’s a 99% chance the deal won’t be completed and you’ll lose your entire investment along with the profit.  Still interested?  Say you want a high EXPECTED profit.  Fair enough, I’ll offer you an expected profit of 25%:  I’ll give you a 25% chance of earning 4 times your life savings, and a 75% chance of losing everything (you’ll have a networth of zero).  Interested?  If you’re reckless and ARE interested in this deal, how about if we set the pay off date as 75 years in the future?

With dividend stocks, it’s often enticing to look at the yield and get greedy imagining the higher pay-offs with larger yields.  Of course, the stocks usually have a high yield for a reason – the market doesn’t feel the dividend is secure.  With companies like Bank of America, the yield was sky high, right before it was cut.  With companies like Washington Mutual it kept going up and up:  until it was cut to $0.01 right before they went bankrupt.

There’s a line from “get rich quick” circles where you say to a seller “You name the price, I’ll name the terms”.  This will get stupid people interested in doing a deal with you so they can get “top dollar” for their property.  The sad truth is, ANY purchase price can quickly be made into a bad deal with certain terms (and offers must be evaluated based on the price AND the terms).

So finally, thanks for your patience and for not making baby Jesus cry, here’s the punch line.  In order to get a 49,250% ROI on an investment, find a fast food restaurant that charges it’s employees for their uniform.    Buy two uniforms for $40, then work there for 40 hours a week for minimum wage ($9.50 in Ontario) for 1 year.  After earning the $19,760 you’ll have an ROI of 49,250% (19700/40).  Feel free to buy two more uniforms in your second year working there and do it again!  To get an infinite ROI, just work at a place that doesn’t charge you for the uniform.  Wow!!!

Categories
Announcements

Don Jail, Alcatraz and Linkstuff Edition For May 25

alcatrazislandThe Don Jail had an open house this weekend for the public – it will be open for last time before renovation into office towers.  We went to check it out however the lineups were unbelievable (4 hour wait) so we left without seeing it.  The jail is available for bookings until October so I’m hoping someone will do some booking and run the tours privately – they could easily charge $5-$10 per person and make some $$.

As interesting as it might have been – I doubt it would have been as good as Alcatraz – of all the “touristy” things I’ve done – a visit to the old island jail ranks #1 on my list.  San Fran is a great city to visit (although very expensive) – I think visiting there and Lake Tahoe (3 hours away) again would make for a great trip.  Maybe when the kids are a bit older… 🙂

The Links

Preet calculated the value in today’s dollars of various billionaires – past and present – very entertaining – real and fake billionaires.

Five Cent Nickel had a pretty darn good post about financial responsibility.

Canadian Capitalist reported on changes to emerging market index.  This will cause a dividend which will be taxable in a cash account.

Financial Blogger talks about managing a one-income household.  It’s easy – just spend a lot less.  🙂

The Dividend Guy has 4 top investing actions to take now.

The Oblivious Investor had a very brief post on the downsides of passive investing.

Million Dollar Journey gives his views on the old age security benefit and OAS clawback.

Money Ning tells us how to dispute unreasonable charges on your bills.

Good Financial Cents wrote about IRA consolidation – the super IRA strategy.

The Intelligent Speculator asks if the US is doing as well as we think?

Investing School explains contributing to a SEP IRA.

ABCs of Investing wrote about investing time horizons for retirees and asset allocation.

Carnivals

Carnival of Personal Finance

Carnival of wealth, money and life

123 of investing and financial planning

Festival of Stocks

Carnival of Financial Planning

Carnival of 20 somethings

Money Hacks Carnival

Personal Finance News Carnival

Wealth, Money and Life Carnival

OneMint Financial Carnival

Carnival of Personal Finance

Photo credit

Categories
Book Review

397 Ways To Save Money – Squawkfox Book Review

investing100

397 ways to save money” is a book written by Kerry K. Taylor, also known as the Squawk behind Squawkfox.com – one of my favourite blogs.  Kerry was kind enough to send me an advance copy of her book and I’m glad she did because it is a really good book.  I have to admit that I didn’t really expect to learn much because I think I have probably already read 397 thousand money saving tips in the blogosphere by now, but I was pleasantly surprised because there is a huge amount of good, useful information which would help anyone.  This book is far more than a bunch of money saving tips thrown together to make a quick buck book – it really should have been called “397 ways to live your life better (and save $$ in the process)”.  There was a lot of thought and analysis that went into this book.

I’ll be publishing a world-exclusive interview with Kerry very soon so watch out for that.

The format of the book

The book is basically in a reference format – the 397 tips are all standalone paragraphs ranging from about 100 words to a couple of pages for longer topics.  It is organized into larger topics such as home ownership, renting, various rooms of the house ie kitchen, bathroom and all the tips in each section relate to the section topic.

Each tip has its own analysis summary so you can get an idea of how much you might save by doing the tip.  Keeping your car tires properly inflated for example had an estimated saving of 2% of your gas costs.

I found it very well organized – Kerry put the “larger” ticket topics such as houses, cars first and followed by various other topics (such as gardening) that while important – probably are not going to impact your finances as much as houses and cars.

Who would benefit from this book?

I really think everyone would benefit from this book.  It is very rare that I want to keep a review book for my own library but I’m definitely keeping this one.  The sections on home maintenance (which I rarely do) and cleaning (again, I rarely do) are worthwhile on their own.

This book is a great reference – I would suggest that if you end up with a copy that you read the whole thing to see what is there and learn a few things.  Because of the wide variety of topics it’s very unlikely that any one person could try to do all 397 tips at one time but it’s far more likely that if they keep the book around they can refer to it when they need some new money saving ideas or if there is a change in their life such as a new house, new baby etc.  It would also make a great gift.

Americans can read it too!  There are some Canadian references but 99% of the book is universal.  It’s only available from Amazon.ca but they ship to the U.S.

How do I buy this book?

Order online from Amazon.ca – they will ship to the United States as well.  The book is $10.94 Cdn which is about $9 bucks US.

What I liked about the book

Here are some tips and things that I thought were notable:

  • Brown bag lunches.  It goes against the personal finance blogger’s code of conduct to talk about saving money without mentioning at least once how much money you can save by making your own lunch.  What I liked about her brown bag lunch saving analysis is that she assumes a cost ($2.50) for the homemade lunch.  Almost all of the various articles I’ve read on this topic completely ignore that cost which makes the analysis useless.
  • Funny.  If you’ve read Squawkfox’s blog for any length of time then you know she’s a pretty funny gal and sharp with her puns.  In a section which was referring to not needing a fancy computer mouse and keyboard, she included the following statement:  Pass on the cheesy features and get a mouse and keyboard that won’t trap you into paying more.”
  • Limit kids activities.   She suggests limiting kids extra-curricular activites to 1 per season – I think this will be hard to do, but I completely agree.
  • Online discount coupon codes.  This is something I only recently became aware of – if you are buying items online then it’s very easy to look for a coupon code.
  • Monthly house maintenance checklist – I really suck at this stuff so I’m using this one.
  • Funny part II.  She suggests cutting down on alcohol and has the following line – “Drinking two fewer bottles (of wine) a month or leaving a few bottles of beer on the wall can save you a lot“.
  • Planned-Overs.  This word refers to meals where you make enough food for at least one subsequent meal.  I don’t think Kerry invented this term but I’ve never heard it before and thought it was a good one!
  • Bed in a box.  In the section on living room furniture, Kerry warns against fold-out couches because they are too expensive and heavy.  She makes the great suggestion (which I’m going to look into) of buying an inflatable bed-in-a-box.  You can store them out of the way and bring it out when guests are staying over.
  • Reading magazines at the library.  My wife and I have been pretty dedicated users of the Toronto library system over the last few years and it is a big money saver.  What I didn’t realize is that you can read magazines there as well – I’ll have to check that out.
  • Gas saving tip – drive less.  Of all the various gas-saving tips I’ve read about, just driving less to save gas is the biggest one by far.  As Kerry puts it – “A Prius on the road will burn more gas than a Hummer sitting in the driveway“.
  • Plant expensive vegetables.  This tip applies if you are into vegetable gardening – try to plant stuff that costs more at the grocery store.  Makes sense to me.
  • Mowing the lawn – use a manual push mower.  This is something that I really believe in and even wrote a post about – Mow the lawn and get in shape.
  • Home made weed killer.  I’m definitely trying this one.

What I didn’t like

There wasn’t anything in the book that I didn’t like however there were a couple of tips that I wouldn’t do.

One tip that I don’t totally agree with was the one that suggested buying kids clothes at the end of the season (for the following season) was a good way to save money.  In theory yes – in reality it’s very difficult to know how much the kid is going to grow over a 6-12 month period.  Just because the kid is 2 feet tall at 12 months doesn’t mean they will grow another 2 feet in their second year. 🙂

Another tip I won’t do (although it might be valid) – there is no way that we would give up our diaper genie.  Just no way!!

Categories
Money

Tennessee Unemployment Benefits Extension – 20 More Weeks?

Update – Feb 7, 2011 – Legislation to add extra weeks for 99ers

Democratic Reps. Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Bobby Scott (Va.) are reintroducing legislation this week to provide additional weeks of unemployment insurance benefits for “99ers,”

Main article

Part of Obama’s 2009 stimulus package was extra funding for states to extend the length of unemployment benefits if necessary.  Most states have a fixed number of weeks available for benefits but can increase the number of weeks if the economic climate is bad enough.  This is usually measured by the unemployment rate.

The unemployment rate in Tennesse was 9.9% for April 2009 which is up from 6.0% in April of last year.  This is the highest unemployment rate in 25 years.  Tennesse has qualified for $141 million to pay for extended benefits as well as upgrades to the benefit infrastructure.

What unemployment benefits are available now?

Currently Tennessee will pay benefits for 26 weeks which is the normal payout period.  There is another 33 weeks which is available because of the 2009 stimulus package for a total of 59 weeks.


Unemployed workers can get up to $275 per week in benefits plus a bonus $25 a week from the federal government for a total of $300 per week.

Will the unemployment benefits be extended by another 20 weeks?

[edit – please note that this bill has been passed]

Currently there is a bill called HB 2324 which if passed will increase benefits by up to 20 weeks.  If the claimant has any children the bill will also add on $15 per week per child up to 3 kids.  This bill has not been made law yet but you can check on the status of the bill here.  At the moment (May 22) it says that it is scheduled for the Finance, Means and Ways committe for May 27.  This bill was first introduced on Feb 26 so it is taking a long time.

Once the bill is passed by the FMW committee then it will go to the house and senate and lastly the governor.

There is a very good chance that unemployment benefits will be extended by 20 weeks however the slow machine of politics means that it might take a while.

Categories
Business Ideas

Leveraging Old Blog Posts

One of the things that really impressed me when I first met Mike was HOW involved he was in the personal finance blogging community.  When he found a blog he liked, not only would he add it to his RSS reader and start following it (and commenting at it), but he’d dig in and read through its complete archive (he’s stopped doing this, but he used to do it all the time).  It makes perfect sense, if you like what someone writes about, why wait for the new stuff when there’s a massive amount of existing material free for the taking?  I’ve never been able to do the same.  After going through (at most) a month or two of the archive, I’ll get distracted and move on to something else:  even with the strongest blogs out there.  I get the feeling most people are like me in this respect, even if they like a blog, they don’t go through its archives.

Given that this is something of value to most blogs / bloggers, it keeps bugging me that there must be ways to make better use of the archives.  I have four ideas, which some people are already doing, but there must be better ways to use them.

  1. Reference old posts in current posts.  I do this all the time (along with everyone else), typically when I want to make a point, but don’t want to explain it again.  I reference the old post, and let anyone who doesn’t believe me click through and read what I previously wrote.  This definitely provides exposure for old posts, and there’s probably a tendency to refer very often to your best stuff (we’re always linking back to Mike’s excellent posts on real estate agents).
  2. Collect cash from advertising on well-indexed old posts.  Apparently (Mike tells me) older posts that have a high rank on Google are one of the most lucrative parts of a blog, as people searching for things will come to the blog, click on an ad or two, then carry on with their browsing.  Regular readers never click on ads (and often don’t even see them if they’re reading the RSS feed).
  3. Use the old posts as the core of a book.  Kevin Smith did this (non-affiliate link) along with a number of other bloggers.  I suggested a few times that a “Canadian Personal Finance Annual” collecting the best posts of the year from various blogs and selling them with some additional material from each blogger as a paper book would be an interesting project (that I don’t *THINK* would take much work), but whenever I’ve mentioned it to people there hasn’t been much interest.
  4. Have a “best of” re-run day.  I don’t actually know anyone doing this, but on a day when you don’t usually post (such as the weekend perhaps), bloggers could start re-running old posts that newer readers haven’t seen before.  Long time readers can ignore the re-run day, while newer readers will probably have a look when it ends up in their RSS reader.  Mike tells me that having duplicate content on your site can get you in trouble with Google and other advertisers…

None of these ideas are terribly appealing, so I’ll throw the floor over to our (far more intelligent) readers.

What neat projects could established bloggers with a large archive, that few people read, do with that archive?

Categories
Personal Finance

Never Underestimate (or Overestimate) Small Savings or Income Opportunities

investing10sideshortMoney saving tips are something you run across quite frequently if you are browsing in the blogosphere (or talking to my parents).  Whether it’s big savings like negotiation tactics for buying a new car, buying a used baby stroller or small stuff like making your lunch and creative uses for used dryer sheetseveryone has a suggestion for saving money.

Alternative income ideas are also a popular topic on many blogs – starting an online business, filling in surveys for money, freelancing, doing odd jobs around the neighbourhood are some of the suggestions I’ve seen.

The problem with a lot of these ideas for saving money and generating income is that they often involve a fair bit of work for a seemingly small return.  There is no question that you should take a good look at any activities for saving money/generating income with a critical eye and make sure they are worthwhile – you should also try to concentrate on the ones that are likely to be more successful (if you can figure that out).

I wanted to share my ideas on 2 concepts which I think should be utilized when evaluating income or saving opportunities.  These might help motivate you to start doing some of these opportunites if they are more beneficial than initially thought – on the other hand it might get you to reconsider some of the activities you are already doing.

Compare the savings/income with your disposable cash flow – not your gross income

Whenever I hear something like “lowering the temperature of your home by 1 degree in the winter will save you up to $400 per year in heating costs” I always have the same reaction…who cares?  $400 is not a small amount of money but it’s not enough to get me to want to freeze my butt all winter.  Same thing on the income side – if you could spend 20 hours setting up a website that earns 50 cents a day – does that sound like a good deal?  Initially it seems to be a big waste of time.

One of the problems with that reaction is that I’m typically comparing the dollar amount I can save (or earn) with a much larger number like annual family income which might not tell the whole picture.  I think a better approach is to try to estimate your disposable income and compare to that.

If you think about it – gross income is just a theoretical number – once you remove taxes and other contributions you only get paid a portion of your gross income.  Once you then remove all your basic living expenses ie mortgage, insurance, food, gas etc then you might not have much money left over (if any).  For some people the left over money might even be negative (this is not good).

In my opinion you should base your decision on whether to put some effort to save money/earn money on how much impact that money will have on your disposable income because that is the money that you notice.  Someone who has high income and low expenses will have a high level of disposable income and therefore will probably not benefit from spending time on small savings and small income streams.  Many people however, high or low income, often have very little disposable income and any increases will result in a significant improvement in cash flow.

So step 1 is to calculate disposable income – there are different definitions but I’m loosely just trying to calculate how much money you have at the end of the day after all your costs are met.  The amount you save each paycheck plus all completely discretionary expenses (ie nice restaurant dinners) could be assumed to be disposable income because you have a choice about whether it gets spent or not.

Let’s look at an example:

Joe makes $65,000 per year.
Here are some of his costs:

  • taxes – $17,500
  • mortage – $17,000
  • insurance – $2,500
  • car payment – $6,000
  • bills (heating, phone) – $7600
  • property taxes – $3,000
  • food  – $4,000
  • other  -$5,000

The total expenses for Joe are $62,600 which leaves him with a grand total of $2,400 of disposable income each year.  While this isn’t bad – it sounds a lot less impressive than his $65,000 salary.

So if Joe has the opportunity to save $400 on his heating bill – rather than dismiss the idea because $400 is only a small fraction of his annual salary of $65,000, he should consider that $400 will increase his annual disposable income ($2,400) by almost 17% which might change his thinking on turning down the thermostat.  He might still choose not to change the temperature but at least now he has a better feel for how much effect it will have on his financial situation.

When evaluating the potential savings or income make sure you use the same time periods

In a previous paragraph I mentioned spending 20 hours of effort to build a website which will yield 50 cents per day (after expenses and income tax) without any further effort.  One mistake which I’ve made in the past is to assume that 50 cents is an insignificant amount of money (which it is) and then incorrectly assume that many piles of insignificant sums of money will also add up to an insignificant amount of money.  In some cases that will be true but not always.

In this case the 50 cents per day will add up to $15 per month which sounds a bit better and $180 per year which sounds a lot better.  If we assume this income stream lasts for 5 years the current value of this income stream (assuming 3% inflation) is $824!

So now that we have done that calculation the question is would you put 20 hours effort to earn $824 over the next 5 years?  Depending on your disposable income, available time, your interest in that task and other factors – your answer might be no or it might be yes – but at least now you are analyzing with the right numbers (which look a lot better than the inital numbers).

This also applies to savings – What if Joe has the opportunity to bring his lunch 3 times a week for a saving of $3 per lunch?  $3 isn’t that much when you consider the effort involved in grocery shopping and making the lunch –  but if he calculates an annual saving ($3 each lunch x 3 lunches per week x 50 weeks per year) = $450 per year and compare that to his current disposable income of $2400 – it might not be a bad deal, especially if he combines his lunch making efforts with turning down the heat a bit.  🙂

Alternatively, rather than convert all your alternative income stream and saving amounts to annual figures – you could reduce your annual disposable income figure to monthly, weekly or even daily amounts if that works for you.

Joe might calculate that his disposable income is $6.57 per day so in that context – adding 50 cents per day of income or savings is far more significant than at first glance.

$ per hour – one common approach when evaluating savings or income is to calculate a $ per hour figure for said activity and compare it to your gross hourly wage at your job or some other figure that you deem appropriate.  This isn’t a bad approach but at a minimum you should consider taxes etc ie compare to your net hourly wage in the case of savings.  This is actually the initial approach I use but I combine it with the disposable cash idea.

The way I usually think of the $ per hour analysis is to calculate how much money I can save by doing a task myself (vs hiring someone) divide by the number of hours of my labour which give a dollar amount which I’m basically paying myself.  Since the gross numbers aren’t necessarily all that meaningfull, I find this analysis most useful when comparing to other tasks ie changing my own oil might only pay me $6 per hour whereas replacing a sink faucet might pay me $18 so it’s not hard to see which activity I should do first.

Categories
Announcements

LinkStuff May 15 – NHL and Car Companies

Strange week in the news last week – the government ordered the car companies to reopen talks with the unions.  I find it quite ironic that these car companies are so poorly run that it takes a bloated government to tell it that more cuts are needed.  On the other hand since wages are not a big factor in car costs is there too much fuss over getting worker concessions?

Another odd story was the attempt to move the Phoenix Coyotes to Hamilton.  The NHL through Gary Bettman is dead set against Jim Basillie (owner of RIM) becoming an NHL owner which is really hard to understand.  No offence against the hockey fans in Phoenix (who are probably all from Canada) but moving that team ANYWHERE at all is a no-brainer.

The Links

Last week, I was interviewed by another Canadian blog – Money Energy – some good questions so check it out.

Kevin Press at the Today’s economy blog has a crush on Elizabeth Warren – who is she you ask?  Well, she wrote the Two Income Trap book for one thing.   She’s so smart she’s like the Chuck Norris of intellectual women (and men for that matter).  Note to Kevin – fix the short feeds!

My Findependance Day doesn’t mind working 20 hour days/ 80 hour weeks.  I think he might have regrets in the future.

My Findependance Day had another great post where he learned a great stock picking lesson from the crash of 2008.

My Dollar Plan went to a real estate auction and picked up a new rental property – it sounds pretty exciting.  I’m a tad skeptical of the assessment though – I don’t think there are any steals in real estate – whatever you pay is market value.

Cash Money Life had an interesting post on a business opportunity that he decided not to take.

The Oblivous Investor says that the Motley Fool gang are a bunch of scamsters – unfortunately I couldn’t agree more.   I think at one time they covered investment basics but now all they want to do is sell you the latest, hottest stock tip.

Million Dollar Journey asks about breaking a mortgage to get a lower rate.

Moolanomy has the low down on how to save money in the shower.

Preet had a very interesting article pointing out that fee-based advisors are not necessarily more ethical.

Financial Blogger has a frugal tip to stop buying.

Money Ning wants to know how much to invest abroad.

Good Financial Cents reports that 2009 required minimum distributions are suspended.

Canadian Capitalist had the lates Dalbar results which show that as usual investors behave badly.

The Intelligent Speculator says that Bank of America is stressed out.

Investing School reviews Share Builder stock broker.

ABCs of Investing wrote about investing in commodities.

Moolanomy has more than 40 alternative income ideas.

Carnivals

Carnival of Financial Planning

One Mint

Festival of Frugality

Money Hacks Carnival

Categories
Personal Finance

Shopping For GICs

My family loves GICs. As a group we’re pretty risk adverse, with my dad being the “crazy risk taker” for being heavily invested in mutual funds over the years (I think I’ve stolen that mantle from him with my real estate and leveraged dividend ventures however).

Much like mortgages, the posted GIC rates in banks are for suckers. There are some techniques for getting top dollars on your GICs, which I typically assume everyone knows, but figured a post would be useful for those who don’t.

To take a step back, GICs (Guaranteed Investment Certificates) are analogous to CDs (Certificate of Deposit) in the US. You put your money into them for a set period of time (often 3 months – 5 years), it is insured by the government (like a bank account) and you are basically guaranteed to get your principle and the stated interest rate back. Because there’s very little risk, the return is quite meager. However, there are a number of ways to boost that return:

  1. Ask. Usually just by asking they’ll increase it by 0.5-0.75%. They’ll be more accommodating if you have more money (sadly, such is life). If you have a wealthier relative and use the same bank / branch as them, often you’ll also get preferential treatment (mention their name)
  2. Comparison Shop. Often the newspaper or various internet sites will show the rates, if they’re insured they’re all pretty much equivalent – go with whoever offers the best rate.
  3. Haggle – If you want to stick with your home bank, tell them the rate being offered elsewhere and ask them to meet (or beat) it. If they refuse, often when you actually transfer the funds they’ll back down and try to get you to cancel the transfer and reinvest with them (assuming its a sizable amount). Don’t give in:  next time they’ll be more accommodating.

If you put money in a GIC, then need it later, you CAN break it, but there’s a penalty cost involved, and given the low returns this definitely isn’t something you want to do. If you want to have more access to your money (liquidity), you can set up a GIC ladder, which is just breaking a large amount of money into separate GICs maturing at different times. If you need the money, you get access to it sooner, if you don’t you reinvest it.

E.g. say you want to invest $10,000 in a GIC for 5 years. Instead, buy 5 GICs, each for $2,000 maturing at 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years. When the first GIC matures, if you don’t need it reinvest it for 5 years. Now the longest you’ll ever have to wait for money is 365 days (assuming you won’t need more than $2k).

Negatives for GICs include that they’re taxed heavily, and inflation takes a big (hidden) bite out of them.  Personally, I just use a high yield savings account for funds that haven’t been put into a specific investment vehicle yet, which gives me complete liquidity.  But back in the day, before these were available, GICs were a (somewhat) decent alternative.