Categories
Personal Finance

TFSA Over-Contribution Penalty – How To Fix It

I’ve been reading a couple of articles lately about TFSA over-contribution penalties which are being levied against some Canadians by the CRA.  These penalties have resulted from people over-contributing to their TFSA (Tax Free Savings Account).  It appears there are two main causes for these over-contributions, which will be discussed here.

[update June 17]

Rob Carrick wrote an article on the Globe with quotes from a CRA spokesperson who appears to be saying that the TFSA contributions will be forgiven, if the error is genuine

In practice, CRA is saying that relief may be available for people who mistakenly overcontributed to a TFSA.

“Because we are reviewing each and every [situation] on a case-by-case basis, it’s correct to say that relief may be provided,” CRA spokeswoman Caitlin Workman said Wednesday. “Each case will be looked at with the facts at hand, so I’m a little wary of issuing a blanket statement. If it was truly an error – that’s what we tend to look at.”

[end of update]

Here is a TFSA rules refresher which contains all the pertinent rules.

What is the rule for TFSA contribution limits?

  • Every Canadian who is 18 years of age or older, gets $5,000 of contribution room per year for the years 2009 to 2012 and $5,500 for year 2013 and beyond.
  • If you make a contribution, then the amount of available contribution room is reduced by the amount of the contribution.
  • If you make a withdrawal, then that withdrawal amount will be added to your available contribution room, starting January 1 of the following calendar year.

What is the TFSA over-contribution penalty?

The TFSA over-contribution penalty is 1% per month, levied on the amount of excess TFSA contributions.  If you have over-contributed to your TFSA by $1,000, then the penalty will be $10 per month until you have removed the excess amount,  or more contribution room becomes available.

TFSA over-contribution penalty because of lack of knowledge of TFSA rules

It appears, that some Canadians have inadvertently created an over-contribution to their TFSA, because they didn’t know that withdrawals from a TFSA account only get added to their available contribution room on January 1 of the next calendar year.  If you contributed $5,000 to your TFSA account in 2009, withdrew money in 2009, and then contributed more money to your TFSA in 2009, then you will be over the contribution limit.

If you are in this group, then I suggest you pay the penalty, remove the excess contribution if it still exists, and learn the rules better, so it doesn’t happen again.  The government was very clear about this withdrawal rule when the TFSA was introduced, and I think it is the responsibility of the individual investor to know the rules.  The TFSA is by far and away the simplest investing account available to Canadians, so getting tripped up by the one rule which is even remotely complicated, is not reason enough to expect relief from the government.

  • To pay the TFSA over-contribution penalty – Fill out CRA form RC 243 by June 30, 2010 (or the year after you are assessed the penalty).
  • To remove excess amounts from your TFSA account – Contact your financial institution and ask them to withdraw the amount of over-contribution.

If you wish to complain about this penalty, then write a letter to Jim Flaherty.

If you still want to try to get relief from this penalty, despite my stern lecture then I’ll suggest the following:

  • Appeal to the CRA – Plead ignorance, poverty, drunkenness – whatever it takes.  They might give you a break.
  • If you contributed more than $5,000 to any one financial institution in 2009, then send them the tax bill and demand they pay it.  Tell them that since it is their job to know the rules, they should have known that you were over-contributing for that year and should have warned you.
  • If you have a financial adviser and still got nailed with this penalty, then send the adviser the bill.  If they were in charge of all your TFSA transactions then they are definitely responsible.

TFSA over-contribution penalty because of incorrect reporting of institutional transfer to the CRA

Another situation, is someone who did a transfer of their TFSA from one financial institution to another, didn’t contribute more than $5,000 in 2009, and still received a notice of over-contribution from the CRA.  In this case, because you were transferring the TFSA money, there is no contribution or withdrawal.  The TFSA money should just move from one institution to another one, without any withdrawal or contribution taking place.  This move is allowed and is called a qualifying transfer.

If you withdrew the money, had the cash in your bank account and then “transferred” it to a new financial institution then you completed a withdrawal and contribution – not a transfer.

It is possible however, that one or both of the financial institutions you had the TFSA at, incorrectly reported the transfer as a contribution or a withdrawal.

For example if you transferred your RBC TFSA to an ING TFSA, then if there was an error made, RBC might have reported the transfer-out as a withdrawal, and ING might have reported the transfer-in as a contribution.

To fix this situation

  1. Contact the financial institutions involved with your TFSA transfer and ask if the transfer was incorrectly reported as a contribution or withdrawal.
  2. If the answer from #1 is yes – then ask the financial institution to fix the transaction so it is a transfer, and then ask them to file an amendment with the CRA.  Once this amendment is accepted by the CRA, then your over-contribution should disappear.
  3. If the answer is no – then call the CRA and try to clarify with them how they are determining you are over-contributed.

Over-contribution penalty is still being charged after withdrawal of excess amount

Michael James mentions yet another situation (see link at bottom of page where a person had over-contributed to their TFSA, fixed the problem by withdrawing the excess amount and yet was charged an over-contribution penalty for the remainder of the year.  In fact the penalty should have only been applied for the time period when they were over the contribution amount.

The CRA is in charge of adding up all your TFSA transactions in your various TFSA accounts and determining if you are staying within the rules.  The CRA relies on the reporting from the financial institutions to collect this data.

In this case, that person needs to contact their financial institution to verify that all their withdrawals were reported properly.  If for some reason, a person’s “removal of excess” withdrawal (which in fact, is just a regular withdrawal) was not reported to the CRA, then the CRA would think the person was continuing to be over-contributed.

To fix this situation

  1. Contact the financial institution(s) that hold your TFSA and verify all your transactions with them.  They need to be able to tell you if any transaction was reported as a withdrawal or a contribution.
  2. If you determine that the financial institution made an error, ask the financial institution to fix the transaction, and then ask them to file an amendment with the CRA.  Once this amendment is accepted by the CRA, then your over-contribution should disappear.
  3. If your financial institution appears to have reported your transactions correctly to the CRA, then call the CRA and try to clarify with them how they are determining you are over-contributed.

TFSA transfer to new financial institutions are expensive.  To avoid transfer fees, please read TFSA Institutional Transfer Strategies.

The cheapest TFSA is available at Questrade Discount Brokerage.  No annual accounts fee and $5 trades.

Other articles about TFSA over-contribution penalties

TFSA Over Contributions at the Canadian Tax Resource blog.

Taxpayers hit with penalties at the Toronto Star – written by Ellen Roseman.

TFSA Over-Contributions May Be Over-Penalized at Michael James on Money.

TFSA Excess Contribution Penalties Ensare Taxpayers at the Canadian Capitalist.

Qualifying Transfer definition at the CRA.  This explains that transfers of TFSA money between financial institutions will not affect your contribution or withdrawal amounts for the year.

Categories
Announcements

LinkStuff For Thursday, June 10

Toronto will be hosting the G20/G8 summit towards the end of June.  It will cost a fortune to host this event and I really don’t see what the benefits are.  Many people will be inconvenienced and the only publicity the city will get will be CNN videos showing various protesters getting beaten up.

The worst example of spending is the “fake lake” being constructed for the low, low cost of only $2 million.  This lake is supposed to be a backdrop for the media.  Ironically it is being built only a few hundred metres from a “real lake” called Lake Ontario.  Bah!

The Links

Rachelle, who wrote a great post here called “The Stripper With Dirty Feet – A Tenant From Hell Story” also wrote a post over at Million Dollar Journey on “How to find the ideal tenant“.

Bruce Teague did a great evaluation of this site for me recently.  I haven’t been able to implement any of his suggestions, since I’m busy with a major project, but you should see some site changes in the near future, which were the result of his analysis.  Bruce is an internet marketing expert and helps people market their ideas, talents, and/or passions on the web.

Being Ruth put together a docu-drama in pictures, called “The Day the Cthulhus Hunted My Bunny“.  Don’t know what a Cthulhus is either?  Better go check it out.

Preet found out that the second largest mutual fund industry is in Luxembourg.

Financial Blogger says that home renovations are not a good investment.  How about an RX8?

The Oblivious Investor has a very simple way to figure out how much money you need to retire.

Debt Free Adventure attempted to answer a reader question about a rather tangled-up family business.  Unfortunately, I think this is one situation that has no answer.

The Wisdom Journal lists 10 first time home buyers mistakes.  It’s a good article because it sounds like Ron learned all of them from experience.

Canadian Capitalist says that when it comes to investing, patience is the key.  Couldn’t agree more.

The Intelligent Speculator warns about being fooled by a high dividend.

Carnivals

Carnival of Personal Finance

Categories
Real Estate

The Stripper With Dirty Feet – A Tenant From Hell Story

This article was written by Rachelle: a real estate guru who works as a property manager and helps investors find rental properties in Toronto and surrounding areas.  She has recently started a very interesting blog called Landlord Rescue.  You can subscribe to the RSS feed here.

I asked Rachelle to write a “tenant from hell” story and she came through in spades.  Let me know in the comments if you enjoyed it and perhaps I can entice her to write more.

I’ve been a property manager for more years than I like to count.  I like the real estate business and I know there’s money to be made. There’s a whole lot of talk about how investors can make a fortune in real estate.  People will sell you books and tapes and courses about how to get really rich in real estate and how easy it is.

Here’s the inside scoop from a person who actually deals with the dark side of real estate investingtenants, the evictions and damages. I’m the lady who deals with the fallout from the “experts” and saves the landlord’s ass when they can’t deal with it one more second. I feel really bad for landlords who have been lied to, cheated and taken advantage of by everyone from investing networks, real estate agents and finally, their horrible tenant.

So here’s a story…

The Stripper with Dirty Feet

Once upon a time, I was a baby property manager. I was hired by a company to manage and fill vacancies for an investment portfolio of about 50 triplexes and fourplexes with the stated purpose of renting them out and then selling them. The couple who owned all these houses were in the process of divorcing and splitting up assets, which I can assure you, lead to an interesting, but tense office environment.

The previous property manager was kept on for a month to “help” me and “train” me.  His actions lead to educational situations; however, I never did get to meet him. I received the inevitable “bucket o’ keys” and a rent roll with some names and addresses and went on my way to make money for the owner.

Unsuspecting and naïve, I excitedly went to examine my brand new assignment. I had to take stock and inspect every apartment that was vacant.  My mission was to rent those empty apartments pronto! I was full of vim and vigor and ready to prove myself.

It was a dark and stormy night as I checked my rent roll, grabbed my bucket o’ keys and headed down to Sorauren Avenue. The rent roll said EVICTED and I wanted to check the apartment and see what was required. So I get to the house, find the door to the basement apartment and start trying keys from the bucket to open the door. I was working on my 20th key or so when the door opened!

My feeble fumblings had not opened the door, a tenant had!  Oh goody, my very first tenant.

I introduced myself “Hi, you scared the hell out of me. This piece of paper here says EVICTED, so I came to look at the apartment to see what it was like. I’m your new property manager.”  He replies “ I’m not sure what you’re talking about, we’ve never been evicted! I’m really glad you’re here since the last guy was doing a horrible job and I have some things you just have to see”.

He leads the way to the bathroom and shows me the problem. “Look” he says “when I flush the toilet it goes into the bath” He illustrates a few times and I can indeed see for myself that every time he flushed the toilet the level of the bath rose. By then the smell is threatening to overwhelm me.  My virgin nostrils are begging for mercy. There’s about six inches of stuff in the bath, it’s lumpy and vile; it’s definitely not water.

We head back into the kitchen. I’m not sure what’s happened to my sinuses, but it clearly isn’t fatal yet. We sit and talk for a while about how horrible the situation is and how negligent my predecessor had been.  At one point, a bleary eyed girl wanders in.  She had just woken up at the crack of sundown. We all talk about how I’m going to fix the problem for a while, then the girl says she has to get ready for work.  I ask her where she’s working and she tells me she works at the strip joint up the street. She says she’s putting herself through college. I nod understandingly.

I get ready to go. I have clearly assessed the problem. I’m starting to take my leave and promising some prompt decisive action.  I see the girl with a handful of clothes as she heads into the bathroom. I’m still standing there when I hear the unmistakable sound of the shower starting.  The impact of what I’m hearing fails to register right away.  I finalize my goodbyes and take leave of that place.

As I’m heading home, several conflicting thought processes are warring for dominance. Clearly I’ve missed something. There’s no way someone would ever… Then I’m thinking about the libidinous gazers at the strip club “Something smells bad” they’ll think. I shudder, thinking about someone stepping into a bath soup so noxious and revolting. I start gagging and resolve to think only positive thoughts from now on.

The Next Day – The Office

I resolutely enter the office. I ask them what the heck kind of shop they’re running around here. My boss digs up a file on the apartment I had visited.  Turns out they owe 8 months back rent and THEY HAVE NEVER REPORTED ANY PLUMBING PROBLEMS. The sheriff was there the month before and locked them out.

My level of dumbfoundedness, exceeds any stupefication I’ve previously ever been comfortable with. I’m way out of my league. Now, I have to figure out what to do. I drive back to the rental apartment and find that there is indeed a broken window.

I talk to the guy at the apartment and tell him that he is evicted, he’s lying and I have the rental file and the sheriff’s notice to prove it. I’m getting mean already and it’s only my second day on the job.  I’m angry because I got taken for a ride. I tell him I’m coming back with the cops. I call the cops, full of righteous anger. They’ve got murders to solve, they tell me. I call my contractor, he agrees to come, brings another lock and some plywood for the windows. In the meantime the man and the woman are taking whatever they can carry in a few dilapidated suitcases.

The contractor covers all the windows and changes the lock on the door.  We go inside and take stock of the property. Now I’m 5 feet tall, I could jump around down there, but the contractor had to walk with his neck crooked because there was no clearance for him to stand upright down there. It’s truly decrepit and it’s full of garbage bags that are full of trash. There are needles all over the floor in the bedroom. The bathroom beckons ominously, I refuse to take the bait and enter. I have to call the plumber for that one.

I look with satisfaction at my rent roll. It says EVICTED and now it’s true. I dream happily about the day it will say RENTED. Little do I know that my transformation has begun, I am no longer the callow college graduate. Some of the shiny newness has already worn off my ambition to be the best property manager I can be.  Later that night I wonder where the stripper with dirty feet is living now. Did she find a place or is she out in the cold?

That’s what it’s like to be in the trenches, to deal with people so damaged and desperate, they can’t pay their rent. It’s horrible and it will change you. You will learn about thing you never wanted to know and meet people you never wanted to meet.

That’s the reality of what you will eventually have to deal with as a landlord. It’s a numbers game and one day your number will come up.

Do you have any “tenants from hell” stories?  Tell us in the comments.

Categories
RESP

How To Withdraw Excess Money From Your RESP

One of the drawbacks with RESP accounts, is that it is very difficult to predict exactly how much money your child will need as a student.  Studying out of town is much more expensive than living at home.  A four year University program is far more expensive than a 9-month cooking course.  Your child might do one year of a post-secondary program and then run off and join the circus.

 

If you are a diligent saver, contribute the maximum amount to an RESP account and things don’t work out as planned, it is pretty easy to end up with extra money in the RESP account when the student has finished.

Why is excess money in your RESP a problem?

When contributions are withdrawn from an RESP, there are no taxes applied since the money has already been taxed.  When non-contributions (ie grants, capital gains, interest payments dividends) are withdrawn from an RESP they are considered income in the hands of the student.  If the child is not eligible to receive payments from an RESP which would be the case if they quit school then the non-contribution payments are taxed in the hands of the subscriber (account owner) along with a 20% penalty.  Needless, to say it is far more preferable to have the money be taxed in the hands of the student.

Here is a more complete description of the RESP withdrawal rules.

This is why financial institutions will always default any withdrawal request to EAP, if you don’t specify otherwise  It is generally in your best interest to withdraw the non-contributions first, followed by the contributions.  This of course, has to be balanced by the fact that the student might pay tax if the EAP amounts are large enough.

A reader question

Reader Lance wrote in with an interesting question (at least it is interesting for someone who likes RESPs as much as I do).

Is there is a limit to how much one can withdraw from an RESP once the beneficiary starts post secondary education. Let’s take an extreme example. Say you really managed to do well performance wise, and your contributions, grants, and returns have totaled $300K. You have one child and they intend on staying at home while completing a four year degree. Assuming that total education needs are reasonable, say under $15,000 per year, are you allowed to take out more as you know you aren’t going to exhaust the $300K? Can you take out $75,000 per year?

I’ve read that you have to have documentation supporting your requirements when you go to your bank/financial institution when you first start taking out RESP money.

The analysis

The federal rules state that to get an EAP payment (educational assistance payment), proof of enrollment at a qualified institution must be provided for each withdrawal.  This is the type of payment made to the student when attending school.

The guidelines also state that the promoter (financial institution) shall:

  • Verify whether the amount requested covers valid educational expenses which will help the beneficiary further their education.
  • The RESP Promoter’s organization may have established guidelines or policies with respect to acceptable educational expenditures.
  • Only $5,000 EAP can be with withdrawn in the first 13 weeks.

Those rules can be found on this page on the HRSDC website.

EAP – Education Assistance Payment.  These are non-contribution payments made to a student enrolled at a qualified post-secondary educational facility.

AIP – Accumulated Income Payment.  This payment is made when collapsing an RESP account, usually because the student decided to end their schooling.  The payment is made to the subscriber and is taxed in their hands along with a 20% penalty.  The 20% RESP withdrawal penalty can be easily avoided however.

Do you need to provide receipts when withdrawing from an RESP account?

To answer your second question, first – No, you do not have to provide receipts or answer questions about how the money will be used.  You just have to provide proof of enrollment. 

Can you withdraw whatever amount you want from your RESP account?

If you do end up with a $300,000 RESP, then your financial institution might be a problem when requesting withdrawals.  I would suggest just keep after them, if there is any resistance.

The real problem with doing an excessively large RESP withdrawal is that the CRA reserves the right to audit any EAP payments after the fact, so if you do an abnormal-sized EAP payment, then they might come calling.  If the CRA decides that your EAP payment was in fact an AIP payment, then the taxes and penalties will be quite severe.

In Lance’s case, if the account was $300,000 and there were $36,000 worth of contributions, then the total EAP amount would be $264,000, which works out to $66,000 per year.

The reality is that there are no solid guidelines as to what the money could be spent on, so theoretically a student could buy a fancy new car for example, since that car would be used to get to school.  Maybe the student could buy a condo if there was a huge amount in the RESP.  Not sure how that would fly with the CRA though.

If you do end up in this situation, then I would consult a tax expert to determine the best course of action.  On the one hand, it would be nice to save on the 20% penalty and extra income taxes, on the other hand you wouldn’t want the CRA to levy the 20% penalty and taxes after the fact, along with a potential fine.

This situation might be more common that you think.  If you have good-sized RESP accounts for three kids and two of them don’t want to go to post-secondary education, then you can transfer their RESP money (minus the grants) to the third child who will end up with a very large RESP.

Another scenario might be if you have a decent-sized RESP account, let’s say $100k and the kid quits school after one year.  You can still do the EAP withdrawals for 6 months after that, but again, will the CRA do an audit if the payments are too large?

What would Mike do in this situation?

Well, as a dedicated passive, low-cost investor, it is extremely unlikely that I would end up with an excessively large RESP account based on investment returns alone.  I do have two kids however, so it is possible that if one doesn’t go on to post-secondary education then the money would get transferred to the other child which might make for a very large RESP.

I wouldn’t worry too much about the CRA, if I am taking extra money out of the RESP that I know isn’t going to be used for education.

Here’s why:

  1. The withdrawal rules were changed in the 2008 budget to allow EAP withdrawals (payments for school) for up to 6 months after the student is finished or quits school.   Why would the government introduce a rule like this, unless they were trying to encourage people to get all the extra money out of their RESP?  Obviously, if the child is no longer enrolled in school then any withdrawals are not going to be used for educational purposes, yet the government went out of it’s way to allow this.
  2. Create some expenses.  In Lance’s case, he asked about a student that lives at home.  Well, how about charging them rent?  Charge them for food, tv time, parking fees, utilities, companionship fees etc etc etc.

Please keep in mind that this should not be taken as advice – I’m only saying what I would do.  Please see a qualified tax accountant if you want real advice.

Categories
Announcements

LinkStuff – Extra Cash And Best Of Blogs Edition

A while ago, I wrote about how we have a very loose budgeting system in place, which involves keeping an excess of cash in our bank accounts.  This makes it easier to manage bill payments etc, and it came in very handy this week when we had a $1,700 car repair bill.  It still sucked to pay the money, but I didn’t even have to think about how I was going to pay the bill.

On with the links

First off, is a great article by my favourite personal finance writer – Rob Carrick, who wrote a nice piece on the two winners of the recent Best of Blogs competition.  Make sure you check out the photos, where you will find Preet doing his best Mary Poppins imitation and Kerry who appears to be living on the set of Little House on the Prairie.  🙂

The Amateur Financier wrote a very good article called “Does Success Skew Your Perception?“.  If someone is successful at something, then they will often talk about how “easy” it is to do or how “anyone can do it”.

The Oblivious Investor explains how to deal with a pension in retirement for the purposes of asset allocation.

The WeighHouse blog wants to know why active portfolio managers don’t move to cash before the market drops?

Jennifer Wells of The Toronto Star had an interesting article about excessive personal debt and how it’s been around for a long time.

Million Dollar Journey had a guest post on the importance of paying attention to financial statements.

Preet has built a know-you-adviser tool to help evaluate current or prospective advisers.  Go check it out and give him some feedback.

Blessed by the Potato wrote about the BP oil disaster and investing.

Financial Blogger went to Quebec City for a weekend of “business”.  I’d like to know how to get my wife to agree to look after the kids for a whole weekend, so I can do that too!  🙂

Canadian Capitalist reports that BMO Investorline had some major trading glitches recently.

Categories
Investing

Should Financial Advisors Disclose Their Commissions?

One of the complaints often heard about the investment industry is lack of disclosure about compensation.  It is up to clients to ask their financial adviser how they are compensated, and even then it might be difficult to verify if the adviser is telling the truth.  The reality is that compensation has a huge impact on the investment recommendations by advisers.

It would seem that more disclosure is the obvious answer, but according to one study I read, it might not make much of a difference in the actions of clients and might make the advisers even more biased.

My wife is currently reading the book Why We Make Mistakes by Joe Hallinan.  This book is similar to quite a few other books I’ve read that analyze why we make the decisions we do.  Books like Your Money Or Your Brain, Nudge, Sway, Paradox of Choice and many others look at various situations we face and try to figure out why we make consistently irrational decisions and what we can do about it.

She pointed out one section of the book to me that refers to a study done by George Loewenstein from Carnegie Mellon.  He wanted to evaluate the effects of conflict of interests disclosure from advisers, on the decision making of their clients.  The study is call “The Dirt On Coming Clean – Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest“.

The study

His study used volunteers who played one of two roles – the “Adviser” and the “Estimator“.  Estimators had to estimate how much money was in a glass jar and were rewarded for accuracy.  Advisers were provided with more information than the estimators and were instructed to give advice to the estimator in order to help them estimate more accurately.  Each Adviser provided an estimate to help the Estimators.

The Advisers were divided up into two groups – one set of Advisers were compensated according to how accurate the “client” estimated the amount of money and the second group was compensated according to how high the “client” estimated – accuracy didn’t matter for that second group.

Another test was that the conflict of interest that the second type of Adviser faced was disclosed to some, but not all of the Estimators.

The results

The actual mean jar value was $18.16.

  • Advisers who were compensated on estimator accuracy estimated an average of $16.48.
  • Advisers who were compensated on high Estimator estimates, but conflict of interest was not disclosed estimated an average of $20.16.
  • Advisers who were compensated on high Estimator estimates and disclosed their conflict of interest estimated an average of $24.16.

It’s fairly obvious from the results that compensating the advisers for encouraging a higher estimate influenced their behaviour.  What was more surprising is that disclosing the conflict of interest actually increased the bias even more.

Lowenstein says that “moral licensing” is one of the reasons this happens.  Basically this theory says that an adviser with an undisclosed conflict of interest will feel guilty enough about it that they will try to “do the right thing” to some degree.  By disclosing the conflict of interest, it allows the adviser to do whatever they want since they have admitted the conflict and therefore don’t have to feel guilty about it anymore.

On the Estimator side, Lowenstein showed that although the Estimators did discount the advice from the Adviser when the conflict of interest was disclosed, they underestimated the severity of the conflict and the estimates were less accurate compared to the estimates provided where there was no conflict of interest.

Summary

Lowenstein concludes that conflict of interest disclosures may not have much benefit, and can even backfire and produce more distorted estimates as a result.  He concludes that the best way to deal with a conflict of interest is to remove it.

In Britain, financial advisers are not allowed to receive commissions.  This doesn’t mean they don’t get paid – just that they have to charge their clients directly instead of being paid by a third party, such as a mutual fund company.

What do you think?  Should financial advisers be more open about disclosure or should commissions be banned like in Britain?

Categories
RESP

How To Avoid RESP Withdrawal Penalties If Your Child Doesn’t Go To School

One of the drawbacks of opening up an RESP account to save for your child’s post-secondary education is that if the child ends up not attending post-secondary education or quits early, then there are some penalties applied when the RESP account is collapsed.

How the penalties and taxes are applied if your RESP account is collapsed

When the account is collapsed then the following happens:

  1. Any RESP grants paid into the account are removed and sent back to the government.
  2. You can withdraw all your original RESP contributions without any taxation or penalties.
  3. Anything left in the account is taxed at your marginal tax rate plus 20%.   This part of the withdrawal is called the Accumulated Income Payment (AIP).

How to avoid the RESP 20% penalty

All you have to do is contribute the accumulated income amount to your RRSP or your spouse’s RRSP.  By doing this, you can avoid the 20% extra penalty and you will defer any income taxes that would have been due on the payment.

Here are the conditions necessary to be able to contribute the accumulated income amount from the RESP to an RRSP:

  • Subscriber is a resident of Canada.
  • Payment has to be make to only one subscriber of the plan.
  • Plan has been open for at least 10 years and each individual who is or was a beneficiary, is over 21 years of age and not eligible for an educational assistance payment (EAP).

But I need the money!

No problem, contribute the AIP amount to the RRSP, wait until the following year and then withdraw the same amount from your RRSP.  Assuming your marginal tax rate is unchanged between the time of the contribution and withdrawal then the amount of income tax paid will be the same as if you hadn’t contributed the AIP to the RRSP in the first place.  And there is no 20% penalty!

What if my spouse and I don’t have any RRSP contribution room?

Good problem to have!.  Assuming you are still working then you can just wait to collapse the RESP until the following year.  Reduce your RRSP contributions appropriately so that you will have enough room next year to contribute the accumulated income portion of the RESP.    In this case you are really only saving the 20% penalty since you are reducing your normal RRSP contribution by an amount equal to the AIP, but saving 20% is still very worthwhile.

Unfortunately, if you are too old to make rrsp contributions, then this plan won’t work.

My son just quit University after one year and there is still money in the RESP – do I have to pay a penalty to withdraw?

If you collapse the RESP account then the penalties and taxes will have to be paid.  However, the 2008 budget allowed for EAP withdrawals up to 6 months after the child stops going to school.  EAP withdrawals are when you withdraw the accumulated income from the RESP.  These will be taxed in the hands of the student and won’t incur any penalties.  If you are in that situation then just empty the account out as soon as possible.  This strategy can only be used if the student starts post-secondary education.

From the RESP Promoter User Guide:

 

Six Month Grace Period

Budget 2008 introduced a six-month grace period for receiving an EAP to provide more flexibility for a beneficiary to access RESP savings. Under this measure, an RESP beneficiary is eligible to receive an EAP for up to six months after ceasing to be enrolled in a qualifying program, provided that the beneficiary would have qualified while still enrolled.

Check out my RESP rules guide for more information on RESP rules and how to set up an RESP account.

Categories
Money

Unemployment Benefits Extension 2010 Updates

This page will contain the latest information on unemployment benefits extension information in 2010.

How the current unemployment benefits tiers work

Currently, Americans can qualify for the following unemployment benefits:

  • 26 weeks of benefits offered by their state.
    Tier 1 – 20 weeks – paid by the government via the stimulus bill.
    Tier 2 – 14 weeks
    Tier 3 – 13 weeks if the state unemployment rate is 6% or higher.
    Tier 4 – 6 weeks if the state unemployment rate is 8.5% or higher.

Tier 1 through 4 are also known as Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC).

It is important to know is that the state unemployment benefits is the only permanent program on the list. All the unemployment benefit “Tiers” are temporary programs with expiry dates after which they won’t be funded anymore. Each tier has a “filing deadline” which is the date by which someone has to apply for a new tier of unemployment benefits.

All the four tiers have a filing deadline of June 2, 2010.

This means that in order to receive benefits for any given tier, you have to be eligible for that tier before June 2, 2010. This doesn’t mean your benefits will disappear on June 2, only that you can’t start a new tier of benefits after that date. You can’t be eligible for a new unemployment benefit tier until you have completed your current tier.

There have been several extensions given so far and the government is currently working to try to continue with these extensions.

I’m receiving EUC benefits right now – will they stop on June 2?

No, if you are currently receiving benefits as part of EUC or Tier 1,2,3 or 4 then you will receive benefits until the end of that tier. For example if you have received 5 weeks of benefits as part of Tier 3 (13 weeks) then you will still receive the remaining 8 weeks even though those payments will go past June 2.

My current tier of unemployment runs out after June 2 – can I still get the next tier?

No, that’s where the filing deadline comes into play. The filing deadline only affects people who are starting a new unemployment tier. If the filing deadline has gone past and you are trying to receive benefits for a new tier of unemployment then you will not be successful unless the filing deadline is extended.

Example – person continue to receive benefits after filing deadline

Susan is currently receiving benefits from Tier 3 which provides 13 weeks of benefits. She has 9 weeks to go but most of those weeks are after June 2. Since she has already started Tier 3 then she will continue to get benefits until her Tier 3 allocation is finished.

Example – Person can’t get to next tier after filing deadline

John is currently receiving benefits from Tier 3 which provides 13 weeks of benefits. He has just a couple of weeks to go but his Tier 3 runs out just after June 2. Since he will be applying for Tier 3 after the June 2 filing deadline then he won’t be eligible for anymore unemployment benefits unless the filing deadline is extended.

Does this have anything to do with creating new tiers of unemployment benefits?

No, there has been discussion of creating a Tier 5 extension for “99ers” who have exhausted all 99 weeks of available benefits but that is not discussed on this page.

http://washingtonindependent.com/77922/unemployment-extension-does-not-create-additional-benefits

http://washingtonindependent.com/85310/unemployment-extension-bill-coming-today