Categories
Investing

TSX Dividend Aristocrats

I’d like to find a listing of Canadian equities that have maintained or increased their dividend payments for the last 20 years. I know this would include all the big banks (I think one of them skipped a dividend payment in the early 80’s, maybe I can forgive them now šŸ˜‰ ). Does anyone have / know of such a list? (basically all Canadian dividend payers and how long they have maintained / increased dividend payments)? If it was a free list that’d be even better.

Thanks in advance for any links!

If you are looking for more information on mutual funds, index funds and ETFs then sign up for a Morningstar free account.Ā  Morningstar is the industry leader in investment information.

Categories
Investing

Leveraged Investments ā€“ The Risks

This is the second post in the “Leveraged Investments” series. Check out the first post entitled “Leveraged Investments – My Grand Plan” .

Two main assumptionsĀ for the success of my leveraged investment plan are –

  1. Interest rates staying at reasonable levels and
  2. Steady dividend increases.

Although the interest rate is tax deductible, if interest ratesĀ increase,Ā theĀ interest amount (the interest payment minus the tax deduction) payable goes up as well and this results in a lower profit or higher loss for the investment plan.There is certainly some room for interest rates to go up and I can still make money but if they get too high and arenā€™t matched by offsetting increased dividends then the plan wonā€™t be profitable.The other problem with increased interest rates which Iā€™ll cover in great detail tomorrow is cash flow.If I borrow too much and then interest rates increase then my personal cash flow will be affected which I would like to avoid.

I canā€™t do much about the risk of increased interest rates affecting the profits of this plan other than perhaps locking in the loan for a longer period of time.As far as the interest rate risk with respect to cash flow ā€“ I need to make sure I donā€™t borrow more than I can handle.

There are many other risks involved with this plan:

Future growth rate of dividends:If this doesnā€™t happen then the plan will fail.Not much I can do here other than to try to pick good companies with proven histories of both paying dividends and increasing them.Based on the last 10 years this looks like a slam dunk.But as William Bernstein wrote in Four Pillars of Investing “Ignore the last ten years” when looking at trends.Iā€™ll have to ignore William on this one.

Investment diversification:Having only Canadian dividend stocks in your portfolio is not very diversified.This risk I can mitigate by treating the leveraged portfolio as part of my regular investment portfolio which is quite a bit larger and I can adjust the asset allocations accordingly so that the diversification is not an issue.

Capital gains:At the conclusion of this plan Iā€™ll want to sell the stocks at a (great?)profit.If the dividend increases go according to plan and interest rates are not too high at the time of selling then this shouldnā€™t be a problem.However if interest rates are high and someone can earn 9% on a GIC then itā€™s hard imagine a stock that only pays 3% being worth a whole lot.All I can do with this one is to be flexible on when Iā€™m going to sell.If I have a five or even ten year period in which to wind the plan down then that should help avoid high interest rate periods.

Equity risk:All equities are risky investments.The Canadian banks and other large successful companies are probably less risky than most but there is still risk involved.I believe the Canadian banks in particular are pretty safe but there is no guarantee that they will still be around in 25 years.Things that could change are the laws about Canadian bank ownership ā€“ if foreign banks are allowed to come in to Canada and compete then that will negatively impact the big five.Another thing that could happen is a one time event like a trading scandal that sinks a bank.It happened to Barings (subject of another post) and it could happen to any of the Canadian banks.

Other factors:This plan requires negative cash flow for the first several years so what happens if I end up unemployed for a long time or have to take a lower paying job?I might be regretting this plan if itā€™s hard to make the payments.Sure you can always sell the equities but what happens if the stocks are underwater at the time you want to sell?Also, the tax rebate wonā€™t be as high if you are in a lower tax bracket ā€“ or are in no tax bracket at all which will change the economics of the plan.

Policy change:What happens if the interest deductibility rules change?What if dividend taxation rules change?These would have a huge impact on my plan.

Another point – if you are thinking of buying another house (upgrading) in the next decade or so and will be borrowing a significant amount to do so, then this plan might work against you because of the debt involved. I don’t know how banks treat investment loans but I would assume it would reduce the amount you could borrow for a mortgage although I guess it would depend on the value of the equities as well. In my case we’ve already moved out of our “starter” homes and won’t be upgrading for the forseeable future so it’s not really an issue for me.

Some of these risks are not all that likely and are hard to manage other than to keep the investment loan amount to a level which will allow me to be able to handle unforeseen situations.

Obviously there are a lot of potential risks to this plan but for most of them itā€™s hard to say how likely they are, which is why in my mind the big two (dividend increases & interest rates) are the ones to watch most closely.

Tomorrowā€™s post will deal with calculating how much I can comfortably borrow.

 

Categories
Investing

Leveraged Investments ā€“ My Grand Plan

This is the first post in the “Leveraged Investments” series.

There has been a lot of discussion lately in blog world about leveraged investing so I thought I would add my take on the situation.I decided at the beginning of this year to look into the feasibility of using some leverage to buy dividend stocks.I figured with my long time line for this project, the favourable dividend taxation rates, and the tax deduction on the interest, that there was a reasonable chance to implement an investment plan which would eventually pay for itself from a cash flow point of view and provide an eventual net profit from the dividend flows and capital gains at the conclusion.

I have three posts prepared on this topic, todayā€™s post outlines ā€œthe planā€, next post will cover all the risks (and thereā€™s a lot of them) and some steps Iā€™m taking to manage the risks, and the last post will look in depth at my analysis of my personal interest rate risk which includes my mortgage as well the investment loan.

The basic plan is to use my home equity line of credit to buy dividend stocks in a taxable account. Stocks would be Canadian dividend stocks, strong record of dividend increases, great companies.Safety of the companies is of utmost concern.

The main reason I was inspired to think of this plan is because of the incredible record of dividend increases that a lot of these companies have had (10% to 20% over the last 10 years).Iā€™m well aware that this is an aberration however thatā€™s what got me interested in this type of investment in the first place.

The other reasons Iā€™m keen on the plan are because of the tax deductibility of the interest on the investment loan and the light tax on dividends. Another attraction is that if the plan is at least moderately successful, it wonā€™t cost me anything to implement.

Here is a model of a scenario that I’ve analyzed.In actual practice I wouldnā€™t buy $100k all at once, accumulation will be much more gradual and I donā€™t have a specific upper limit.

Some numbers – my marginal tax rate is 43%, tax rate on dividends is 21%. I set up a model where I buy $100k of stock yielding 3.1% and the dividends increase 5% per year. Interest rate is 6% and never changes.All figures have been discounted to 2007 dollars using a 3% discount rate.

$6000 is paid in interest each year, $2603 tax rebate received each year.

In the first year the dividend income is $3100, after tax dividend income is $2449 so the profit for me is the interest – tax rebate – net dividend income = -$948 for the first year.

In the second year, the dividends have increased by 5% so the annual profit = -$826.

In year eight the annual profit is now positive at $49 and it continues to grow after that.

At the end of year 14 ā€“ the total of all the cash flows in todayā€™s dollars add up to $436 which means that at that point in time, my overall cost at that point is zero and I have $436 in profit from the dividends.

By the end of the plan (25 years), the total of all the annual net profits/losses from dividends is $17,866 in 2007 dollars.To calculate the potential capital gain I took the gross dividend income in year 25 ($9,998), divide by 0.05 (Iā€™m assuming a 5% yield) which gives me a $200k valuation of the equities.I calculate that if I were to sell all the stocks at that time and pay off the loan I would have a 2007 present value of $38,500.Adding the net dividend income + net gains gives me $56,374 in 2007 dollars.

Bottom line is that in this model I’m paying only $3620in today’s dollars over the first seven years to get things started. Even in year one, 84% of the interest cost is covered by the tax rebate and net dividend. By the end of year 8 my cash flow is now positive and by year 14 I’ve broken even in that the annual profits I’ve received from the dividends have paid for my initial costs.If the plan works exactly as the model does then I would make a profit equivalent to $56,374 in 2007 dollars.

You might have noticed that like most leveraged plans this one didnā€™t mention any of the risks involvedā€¦.that will change tomorrow when I will go through every risk I could think of and how Iā€™m planning to mitigate those risks.

Here is my spreadsheet for this model: Div Sheet

See the next post in this series “The Risks”.

Categories
Investing

Why Iā€™m Not Crazy About Emerging Markets

Emerging markets are supposed to be the ā€˜hotā€™ markets, the place where the adventurous can get more return for more risk which is a tenet of many investment books including Four Pillars of Investing.

Iā€™ve noticed that there are quite a few funds particularly Latin American funds which are extremely volatile but donā€™t necessarily have ā€œbetterā€ long term returns although they have very good recent returns.

I decided to try doing some extremely unscientific research on emerging market mutual funds, using GlobeFund.com ā€“ ā€œemerging market fundsā€ category.

When I did the query on the emerging market funds, there were 71 funds available. I sorted by 10 year returns to get all the funds that have been around for at least 10 years which does not include funds which no longer exist but should be counted in the study (survivorship bias).

I got the ā€œsince inceptionā€ return ā€“ this is not all that scientific since the dates are not the same but the idea is that if people bought at the beginning of the fund ā€“ thatā€™s the long term return they would have. I took all these funds which have been around 10+ years and put the data on a spreadsheet. This group seems to be mostly Latin American funds.

I removed all the duplicates (ie US$ versions, different classes) and calculated the average return from inception which came out to 6.3%, if we add 2.75% mer that gives us approximately a 9.05% gross return.

Given the extreme ups and downs of this group ā€“ the returns donā€™t seem to match the risk whether you bought the index or a retail mutual fund. By way of comparison the TSX total return for the last 10 years is 10.33% and 15 yrs is 11.88% which is not only higher but with less volatility.Ā  MSCI Europe (Cdn$) was 8.93% for 10 years and 11.78% for 15 yrs.Ā  *S&P 500 Composite Total Return Idx($Cdn) was 5.56% for 10 years and 10.41% for 15 years.

Of course with emerging markets doing so well over the last 4 to 5 years it seems silly to worry about the long term returns but for someone who is thinking about starting an emerging market position now, they should be very cautious.

Are emerging markets worth their volatility? These markets are much more volatile than developed markets so if they donā€™t outperform over the long term then you are better off sticking with developed markets.

Iā€™m still planning to have a portion of my equity in emerging markets but I plan to err on the side of caution and will go a bit underweight in this sector.

Categories
Investing

My Portfolio ā€“ Summary

This is basically a summary of the last four posts where I described different parts of my portfolio using exchange traded funds.

For the equity/bonds split I decided to have 75% equity and 25% bonds. This is a reflection of my fairly long investment time horizon, I wonā€™t be retiring for about 17 years and will hopefully live a long, long time after that. This was also the recommendation by Bernstein as the ideal percentage of equities to own in a portfolio. There will be quite a bit of volatility with this mix so hopefully my risk tolerance is up to the task!

In the bond section which is 25% of the portfolio,

XSB ā€“ 8% – short term bond ETF which I decided was a better choice than a long term bond ETF.

GICs ā€“ 7% – canā€™t get much safer than this.

Bond fund ā€“ 5% – MER is 0.65% so a reasonable deal.

Real return bonds ā€“ 5% – This will be implemented by buying the ETF XRB ā€“ the iShares real return bond ETF.

In the equities section which is 75% of the portfolio we haveā€¦

Canadian: 20% – low cost mutual fund + one lot of BMO

U.S. 33% – VTI ā€“ Vanguard US equity ETF

International: 33% – new Vanguard EAFA ETF (not out yet) + low cost Europe fund

Emerging Market: 8% – VWO ā€“ Vanguard emerging market ETF ā€“ Iā€™m still thinking about this allocation.

Reits: 5% – XRE ā€“ iShares Reit index or possibly some Vanguard VNQ.

Total MER for the portfolio is 0.38% which is pretty good considering the current MER is about 1.2%. I will be tracking (pun intended) the tracking errors of the ETFs to see if that has a negative effect on the performance. The tracking error on ETFs is basically the difference between the index return minus the MER and the return of the ETF.

So there you have it, I still havenā€™t actually bought any of the ETFs yet since Iā€™m waiting for the new Vanguard EAFE ETF, so if you have any suggestions for changesā€¦itā€™s not too late!

Categories
Investing

Borrowing to Invest

I keep thinking there are some real opportunities to take advantage based on the idea of borrowing to invest (and the tax write offs revenue Canada offers for them).

Say I owned my house free-and-clear, and pay a 40% marginal tax rate (20% on dividend income). I could get a fixed-rate mortgage for 80% of the value of my home for 5.75% right now (3.3% after taxes, since I’m borrowing to invest and this is deductible). If I can safely get a 4.125% after taxes dividend-yield on my investment, then my dividends will pay for my mortgage.

Say instead, I deliberately sacrifice some yield and buy equal amounts of the big-6 banks (average dividend yield on them is around 3.25%, 2.73% after taxes in this case, right now I think). I’m now paying 0.57% on my mortgage (and the dividends are covering the rest). This is certainly a loss (since the 0.57% is coming out of my pocket), and people always say “don’t lose money just to spite revenue canada”, which makes good sense. HOWEVER I haven’t considered any capital gains or dividend increases in this situation. As long as the AVERAGE increase on these 6 bank stocks is greater than 0.57% a year (very likely if I’m holding for the long term), I should come out ahead. I will have to pay capital gains when I sell, but that will hopefully be at a point when I’m earning less income (or else why would I be selling?). Additionally, since I’m in a fixed rate mortgage, hopefully the dividends will increase (but the interest rate can’t), so if the dividends go up a little bit then I’m not out any money any more.

You could maximize this “risk protection” by going with a longer mortgage term (currently you could get a 10 year mortgage for 6.04%).

On a $200,000 mortgage this would cost $1140 / year, a nice little investment for $100 / month.

Obviously I’d be paying taxes when I sold the stocks (capital gains) or when the dividends increased, but that seems to be shifting my tax burden into the future (the same way an RRSP would), which people generally seem to feel is a good idea.

The risk to this is that the banks cut their dividends and all go bankrupt, then you’re back to paying a mortgage from scratch (as if you’d just bought the house). That would certainly suck, but I think the chance of *all* the banks dropping significantly is pretty small.

If I accept this risk, and want to get even more aggressive, I could choose a cash-back mortgage which would increase the interest rate (and hence the deduction) and provide more cash to buy dividends with (I would be counting on an increasing dividend / capital gains to compensate for this). This would cost more right now on a monthly basis, but that’s what I want (to shift income and taxation into the future). Getting EVEN MORE aggressive (I’m scaring myself now) would be to get the mortgage with the cashback, then buy the stock, then buy even more of the stock on margin (E*Trade would allows you to buy 70% on margin for stocks valued above $5). In theory you could buy $363,800 worth of bank stock (with a 200K mortgage, 7% cashback and 70% on margin). The stock could drop 41% before there was a margin call (and if you were earning a good income or had other liquid investments you could probably meet the call if this happened).

You could (if you had the extra income and wanted to maximize the future income) even keep buying additional stock (on margin) with the dividends and pay the mortgage payments with your income (assuming you could afford the full mortgage payments). This would be more a forced-savings / dollar-cost-averaging strategy rather then a taxation strategy though.

The “reasonable expectation of profit” that Canada Revenue insists on is certainly there (it wouldn’t be unreasonable to expect the stocks to go up 1% over the next year in the least aggressive situtation detailed above).

Does this work as I understand? Why don’t people do more of this (buying on margin / on mortgage for tax purposes instead of for leverage purposes) once they’ve maxed out their RRSP’s?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts or pointers to relevant books / articles!

Categories
Investing

DRiP at a Discount

I’d been looking for something like this and just found it: http://cdndrips.blogspot.com/

Its basically a listing of all the Canadian DRiPs, along with the discount (sweet!) they offer for shares purchased through the DRiP.

Categories
Investing

Mingling Funds

Say I get paid a dividend (perhaps from my ROC that’s due mid-month) and its paid into my E*Trade account. That account has a negative balance (since I’ve been trading on margin). That interest paid on that negative balance is tax-deductible.

How is that affected if I withdraw the dividend payment and use it for something else? Say I withdrew it and applied it to a principle residence mortgage (non-deductible debt). From Revenue Canada’s perspective, would I have paid back part of my margin loan, then re-borrowed the money for non-deductible purchases (and thereby “contaminated” the margin loan), or would their view be that as long as I withdrew EXACTLY what was deposited, then I didn’t really repay any of the loan (it just traveled briefly through my account)?

If the mingling is bad, can/should I get E*Trade to make dividend payments directly to me?

Thanks if anyone knows! A pointer to a sites dealing with this issue would be greatly appreciated!